Getting Started First steps • FAQ Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Community Portal • Help desk • Village Pump Where to ask questions or make comments • Request administrator attention Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Place ((helpme)) on your talk page and a small message explaining the problem The Commmunity Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists		Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

ukexpat (talk) 17:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Organmountains. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for feedback.
Message added 17:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

ukexpat (talk) 17:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. You will need to provide references that meet the requirements of WP:RS - significant coverage in the press or other similar media, but note that they don't have to be online sources, as long as they are verifiable. The blog can be listed as an external link, but should not be a reference. – ukexpat (talk) 22:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further to your recent message, I have done some work on reformatting the draft so that it complies with the Manual of Style. Note that you cannot use Wikipedia as a reference and note how I have linked Wikipedia articles by enclosing the name within double square brackets. You still have a fundamental problem with notability - without third party reliable sources you are not going to be able to establish that she is a notable author per WP:AUTHOR. At the moment she looks like a self-published author and without citing significant coverage in reliable sources, this is going to be an uphill struggle. – ukexpat (talk) 15:09, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]