This user is a regular, and is indifferent to being templated. You may choose to template or not template him at your own discretion.
Please note that from April 11, 2024, I will be using the username Neuropol, as long as the original user does not object. If I signed with Personhumanperson, you are in the right place.
Any constructive feedback is welcome. I try to respond to everything, so please feel free to message me here for any reason.
Unless you are replying or adding to a discussion, please don't add your messages to a pre-existing category, I will sort them myself. They will automatically be in the incoming category.
Accomplishments
Below is a record of my accomplishments, such as article creations and user awards.
Septal veins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! I looked through your edits and noticed you often mark every reversion you make as vandalism. While this may be true in most, there often times when the editor either did not know they were disrupting Wikipedia, or they were simply making a test edit. In either case, I encourage you to send them a welcome message (which Twinkle makes extremely easy) after making your reversion. I also notice that when reverting edits you don't warn the user who made them. Twinkle makes this easy by providing templates for most situations.Fanfanboy (talk) 19:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thank you for the notice.
Taking your advice, from now on, I'll mark my reverts more ambiguously, and use the warning template from Twinkle. Any other suggestions are appreciated.
You're welcome! Some other advice I can give you is to read what each warning template is used for (not all of them though since there's a lot of them). This can help by telling you possible ways an edit can be problematic. Like with unexplained content removal ((uw-delete1)), which is used when someone removes content from a page without explaining why (different from blanking a page but using the template would still work for both). Fanfanboy (talk) 20:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that from April 11, 2024, I will be using the username Neuropol, as long as the original user does not object. If I signed with Personhumanperson, you are in the right place.
