You deleted this page a short while ago, yet I believe it was serving a useful purpose. LCM may not be notable to you, but there is in fact a substantial user base (specialized as it is). It is also not commercial, so any concerns about the page serving more as an advertisement than information should be ameliorated. Finally, the acronym has several potentially confusing collisions, which seems to increase the need for disambiguation. These purposes were all served by the wikipedia page which you deleted, and I am unable to find any clear wikipedia criteria which support its removal. Would you restore the page? 141.212.108.187 (talk) 16:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC) (ebolson@umich.edu)
I noticed you removed the image Grandcountyhighschool.jpg, due to a lack of licensing information. I took that picture a couple years back while attending Grand County High School, and it is currently on their website, [1]. I figured it would probably be deleted eventually. Next time I am in Moab, Utah I will take a new picture of the building and release it into the public domain. Crashedata (talk) 19:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Phil! I have had a username rename and still would like to work on this article for educational purposes. By chance could you please restore it along with its edits history to User:A Nobody/List of unsolved problems in Egyptology instead? Thanks! --A NobodyMy talk 15:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi PhilKnight
One year ago you have deleted the TerrainView-Globe wiki page. Can you help me to undo the deletion? The company has been relaunched in August this year. http://www.viewtec.net
Thank you. Interactive3d 20:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
00:07, 6 October 2007 PhilKnight (Talk | contribs) deleted "TerrainView-Globe" (Expired PROD, concern was: Company seams to be out of business. None of the claimed facts can be verified. Company does not respond to any email and support forum and whole web page is down (just showing some sort of entrance page). Article se) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Interactive3d (talk • contribs)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Output, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Output. Thank you. SpinningSpark 22:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
I hope J.delanoy isn't insulted by it. -- IRP ☎ 21:17, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm afraid this has been happening on all of them except one or two. I suspect both I and Dibol will have a block for edit warring.Mr T (Based) (talk) 10:19, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Me and Seddon are hoping to pull you in for a bit... think you'll be on within the half hour? Xavexgoem (talk) 17:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello Phil, I would like to request your mediation in the article Operation Blue Star at [[2]]. There has been a long discussion on how the "Allegations of Crimes/cruelty" can't be considered criticisms. Please go thorugh the discussion here and share your input. Many Thanks! [[3]]Princhest (talk) 21:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Was the rationale missing, or was there a particular reason for an I7?
I think there is an appropriate way to use this as "group" character images are preferable to individual character images. I'll just use the same justification as was used for the group pic for VG Cats WhisperToMe (talk) 03:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting me at my successful Rfa! Hope to work with you in the future!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 17:16, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I have now included sample diffs, as I was called away from the computer before I could add them before. Also, so far the two admins commenting have agreed with me. Is it possible your notification was hasty? Jayjg (talk) 19:16, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Considering the events discussed here, I am surprised that Jayjg had not been notified already. Mackan79 (talk) 20:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Just letting you know that I posted some more stuff on the WP:AE case. Not saying you should immediately retract the warning to Jaakobou, but it will be much appreciated if you look at what I said and maybe further inspect the dispute going on at the article. In short, it now seems very clear that the issue is a content dispute between Tiamut and Nishidani on one side, and Jaakobou on the other. There are policy violations by both parties, especially Tiamut herself (who filed the WP:AE case in the first place). Please look into it! Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 21:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi there Phil. I was just wondering if you'd mind removing Jayjg from the list of editors notified about the P-I article arbitration? I think it would do a lot to reduce the heat here. He obviously already knows about it and the situation seems to have flared up over such a minor incident. Whilst Jayjg's words were strongly worded, I don't don't think they crept into incivility and he was just expressing his opinion in a meta discussion rather than any disruption on article talk pages. It would be much appreciated if you could take a look into the situation. I'm going to pop to bed soon, but in the morning when I'm fresh I'm going to set up a content RfC and start discussing the possiblities of informal mediation (I'll have a think of a suitable mediator - Wizardman or Seddon spring to mind off the top of my head). Best regards, Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Just an FYI, Timeshifter (talk · contribs) re-added Jayjg to the list. I've removed that addition (and notified Timeshifter), because my sense of the ruling is that it really ought to be an uninvolved administrator taking that step. Best, Mackensen (talk) 02:43, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for taking care of my unblocking Phil
Anthonyrussell84 22:36, 17 November 2008 (GMT)
For reverting the bot - I wasn't aware of the rules about adding a link to a Facebook group? All my other edits should be "kosher" i think? I don't mind if the Facebook link has to be removed, but I hope all my other edits don't get lost because of it!--Howdypardner (talk) 16:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Erm, why did you delete the previous thread? Phil, I'm starting to get a little worried about what you're doing, and I'm wondering if I should take this to ANI. What's going on? --Elonka 19:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
I just noticed the Pseudoscience notice you gave to Seeyou. In case you're not aware, the last ANI about Seeyou resulted in the recommendation that Seeyou's behavior should be brought up at RFAR. I think it would be best to leave it to Arbitration Enforcement per your notice. Was that what you had in mind? --Ronz (talk) 02:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I think this school has two articles and someone redirected Patrician Secondary School to Patrician Secondary School Newbridge but you reverted it. Is there something I missed? Are these two different schools? --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 21:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
--Efe (talk) 03:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi can you unlock this page? I need to start it. He was a FInnish politician. Count Blofeld 16:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Phil. Its just a stub, but I have a log of missing articles to get up and running from other wikipedias. I could probably google translate them but as we know it is more than likely going to be completely wrong! Best Count Blofeld 16:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Why did you delete these images, and without alerting me? How was their use invalid? There was no invalid justification for their use at all. Flyer22 (talk) 18:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, you deleted this article back in July as he failed to meet notability criteria for a sportsman. As he played his 1st fully pro game yesterday can we have the article restored please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.176.7 (talk) 08:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
The Mizu onna sango15 Barnstar | ||
Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed, all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced. |
Dibol's edit summary and 64.85.234.166's edit summary. Are they the same person?Mr T (Based) (talk) 12:55, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey there, I noticed you blocked 98.212.229.85 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) indefinitely. Per Wikipedia:Blocking IP addresses, IP addresses should almost never be indefinitely blocked. I also notice this IP has no block history, and their edits seem to be nothing more than run-of-the-mill vandalism, justifying no more than a 24-31 hour block IMO. Was this a mistake? Thanks, VegaDark (talk) 00:13, 25 November 2008 (UTC)