Can I get some assistance or advice with what happened concerning some of Luis' sources? I posted the reasons why I was removing his edits on the history page for rRcism in Cuba and on his talk page. His sources are not reliable and apparently removing them myself only leads to him getting me banned, so I'd like to know if there is anything that can be done to help set those articles straight. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zd12 (talk • contribs) 01:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to undelete those images. Here is a little moon to help you see in those dark nights. LA @ 05:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC) |
Ribbon |
---|
Hello PhilKnight... Would you be willing to undelete two images you deleted? They were deleted in my absence, and I had just noticed. I still use them on occasion. The images are File:Wikisun2.JPG and File:Wikimoon.jpg. Hopefully this isn't controversial. I would have objected had I known that they were up for deletion. LA @ 13:32, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
To avoid me starting an edit war. Can you take a look at the discussion between Ronz and me. See the BM article : [1]. Regards, Seeyou (talk) 20:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
for the barnstar. :) Ncmvocalist (talk) 18:19, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
SpongeSebastian has started to use an IP sock shortly after his block. Please warn/ban 209.247.23.201. The Cool Kat (talk) 23:12, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for acting on this. I could still use some advice on what I'm best doing, though. And the same guy seems to be editing from 81.50.43.195 (talk) as well, now; any suggestions on what I should about that? Swanny18 (talk) 14:21, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Phil, I just added an image to commons and was a little worried I didn't do it correctly, would you mind checking if File:Logo International Court of Justice.jpg has the correct information, or point me in the direction of who could tell me? Left a message on the helpdesk there, doesnt seem like that gets too much traffic though. Thanks, Nableezy (talk) 05:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Hiya. Just wondering what the story was with the Shell to Sea mediation - the other user involved has decided to resume editing of the disputed articles due to lack of activity on the mediator's (yourself and Twiznor) parts. Gimme a shout! Thanks! Fin©™ 14:52, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you deleted Sonic Unleashed Fusion, which I proposed for deletion, under WP:CSD G1. This criterion says:
Pages consisting purely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history.
At the time I PRODed it, it was quite coherent, and appeared to be about a sequel to Sonic Unleashed (albeit one which did not exist. Therefore, I feel that the page should be undeleted, and re-deleted once the PROD expires, unless anyone objects, per standard procedure.--Unscented (talk) 19:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Could you explain the policy so I don't make the same mistake again (Orton pic)? --WeezleBeezle (talk) 20:49, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Dear PhilKnight. Things have been much, much quieter and more cheerful over at Scriptural Reasoning of late. I would value your opinion on my latest, quite wide-ranging edit of the article, designed to put to bed remaining worries about referencing, NPOV, and COI. Specifically, I have asked a few simple questions about the new edit at the bottom of the talk page, and would be grateful for any responses, should you have time to pop over. I'm not asking you to mediate in a controversy - simply to provide an opinion on whether we can now remove the flags that mark the article as having problems in these areas. Should only take a few minutes. --mahigton (talk) 22:30, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Reviewing the other external links on the "spelling" page; my external link appears to fit there well as it shares the same characteristics as some of the other links already shown there. allankirsch.tech.officelive.com contains a list of possible spelling errors on the newly redesigned www.whitehouse.gov website. I would think that people would find this information very useful and interesting. It also contains a list for the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO). If you can show me anyone else who can produce such lists I would be very interested to know about them.
Sincerely, surfersurfer20022002 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Surfersurfer20022002 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Phil, just to let you know I've sent you an email. Regards, Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:20, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
The reason for my ext.link was to allow people to see the spelling errors on the newly designed www.whitehouse.gov website. What is the proper way to allow people to see it within Wikipedia.org? That is the freebie rather than a service. Would a direct link to the report be allowable? I can't copy it off that website because it's not mine.
If there is no way for people to be able to find this information on Wikipedia.org then I think it's a real disservice to the public! If you think the report is not real then lookup the misspellings on www.whitehouse.gov to verify, because they are real.
I noticed that Spellr.us is allowed an external link on the "spelling" page and sells it's service?
surfersurfer20022002
Mr. Knight;
I recently added a couple of paragraphs and a video link to the Explanation section of the Dysmenorrhea page. I see that you reversed these edits.
I am new to Wikipedia and am hoping to be able to contribute. I am hoping that you could show me what I did right and what I did wrong with these edits.
Although I added a few sentences, my main intent was to add a link to the video, since we have several informative ones on topics relating to Dysmenorrhea, Endometriosis etc. Is there an appropriate way to do this?
I would appreciate any help you can give.
Thanks,
Steve
Santonellis (talk) 03:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
We desperately need some outside editors to take a look at this. Thanks. Academic38 (talk) 14:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thanks for assisting with that recently-insistent addition of inappropriate material to Pop music. i was looking around for possibilities for finding someone who might be willing to provide that editor with some coaching, and i note with interest that you work with WP:MEDCAB - can you perhaps take on this "case"? the slow edit war is feeling pretty unconstructive and the editor appears to be ignoring the talk-page discussion, but maybe someone could successfully step in as a "mentor" on his/her talk page to help him/her understand what kind of writing style and content is needed on wikipedia. what do you think? thanks for your help and insights Sssoul (talk) 08:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Phil, Not really good with computers am an old Grandma trying to put together Family Tree before my time comes up. Have just noticed this page was deleted in 2008. Please what was the reason? Have pages of printed and written notes, not matter how hard I try I cannot make the connection between Eleanor of Castile 1244-1290. Probably staring me in the face. Will the deleted page be brought back to life? Thankyou and regards Marilyn Bacon210.49.182.10 (talk) 06:40, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Thankyou Phil, your answer most informative. I do understand the lack of firm proof. I will press on trying to find that one missing generation to connect my tree. I know Zaida is the connection, but not sure how it connects with Eleanor of Castile. I really enjoy the Wiki pages. Cheers Marilyn Bacon210.49.182.10 (talk) 22:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, things have seem to have settled down. Thanks Blackash (talk) 10:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Template:Magazine rationale has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. ViperSnake151 11:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Template:Symbol+rationale (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. --GedUK 16:54, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Ha - noting your block edit summary, I was about to do the same thing and indef the obvious impersonator, but you saved me having to make the possibly embarrassing move myself :) Mfield (Oi!) 20:57, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Dear Phil! Thank you for your feedback! I am not very happy that you would consider my article as blatant advertising, Optimal Challenge is a new term coined and the German equivalent is in the German wikipedia! Dr. Herbert Laszlo wrote books about the subject and constantly gives talk and is invited to expert rounds...
I read the instructions and thought that this would be a good addition to wikipedia! How can I ad picture or could you please, I have them right here.
Thank you for all your help and hope that we can make this happen! Sonia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.208.155.43 (talk) 18:43, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
I propose that the Personal Freedom Organisation page, which was deleted August 6, 2008, be restored. The organization has received attention twice in a national magazine, Christianity Today: Watchers Adopt Guidelines and Word-Faith Movement Out on a Limb. The praise of Budd Press of Christian Research (which has itself received attention by WorldNet Daily) may also be considered.
PFO's memberhip in Evangelical Ministries to New Religions and its adoption of a manual with guidelines in theology and ethical conduct in the countercult network should, in my opinion, be mentioned in the article, since it gives credibility to the organization. --Jonund (talk) 15:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
I think there is a missing "not" in your posting, but I didn't feel it was appropriate to make the change myself; would you take a look? -- John Broughton (♫♫) 20:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Phil, could you move the Mahmud al-Zahar to Mahmoud al-Zahar. It is the most common spelling for his name and is found in the major sources: Al-Jazeera, Ynet, BBC, Washington Post, and The Times. Let me know if this should go to requested moves, but this seems pretty uncontroversial. Nableezy (talk) 23:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)