Dear Sir, I herewith ask you ro restore the page KolibriOS.
In our opinion, the reasons for its content's removing were incorrect:
1) the auditor ignored numerous references to this special-interest & hobbyist Operation System on flatassembler.org: [1]; also, the system has been listed along with many other similar OSes in LinuxFormat Magazine// No.4, 2009.
2) we always stressed [2] that KolibriOS had been forked from MeOS-32 following its original GPL licence to avoid any reason for allegations in copy-paste and plagiarism. V.M.Turjanmaa and other MeOS pioneers are listed in a honourable place in our developers' list despite huge difference in source codes accumulated during last six years. MenuetOS might forget some moments of their history, but we remember our origins.
Yours Art zh (talk) 11:36, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Art_zh (on behalf of kolibrios.org developers team)
The page you deleted was not sourced from the link you assumed(http://www.piit.ac.in/admissions.htm). The data was sourced from Director of Technical Education website (http://dte.org.in/fe2009/), this is the official website of the organisation which conducts MHT-CET exam in Maharashtra(India). All the websites(including you suggested) source the information from DTE(http://dte.org.in/fe2009/). There is no copyright involved as this data is under Right to Information Act of India (RTI). Let me know what is the procedure for resubmission of article as I am new to Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gijyo9 (talk • contribs) 11:20, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
I have sent you an e-mail. --Tenmei (talk) 17:13, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi. You just blocked User 24.128.111.134. However, he or she is continuing to post personal attacks on their talk page. I was wondering, should I revert these or just let him or her wear themselves out? In the meantime, I'll revert them. Thanks. -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 13:56, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I'm Hotel5550. I just found recent vandalism on List of Criminal Minds episodes and I reverted it. I told the unknown user, 98.14.218.176, to not do that. To make sure that doesn't happen again, could you block this person? Hotel5550 (talk) 03:50, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi PhilKnight! I was wondering where you can make requests for articles to be created. Do you know how to make requests? Hotel5550 (talk) 04:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi. You speedied this article as a copyvio of http://www.molinu.org/drug_therapy_problems, which it now turns out is a Wikipedia mirror. I've restored and userfied it for the author to work on. Just thought I'd let you know in case you come across the site again. Cheers! Olaf Davis (talk) 18:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Can you userfy the Template:Rachel Talalay.--TheMovieBuff (talk) 20:33, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Phil, a quick question (I hope). Are you aware of any prohibition in MOS against using boldface in an infobox? I have never heard of such a thing, can find nothing in MOS on this subject, and have seen boldface used in numerous infoboxes. So... I am a bit perplexed. Any clue? ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 16:28, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
The anon. user says an editor named "bovineboy" (I assume it is User:Bovineboy2008 pointed him to WP:MOSBOLD for an explanation of why boldface should not be used in infoboxes. But, I do not see the infobox discussed anywhere in this policy. If this user is, indeed, making these changes, as the anon. indicates, he needs to be set straight. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 14:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi User:Tamaskanwolfdog has restored the CSD templates to Tamasakan Dog after you declined them. I removed the templates, but Tamaskanwolfdog restored them within seven minutes.
From what I know, there is an off-wiki dispute between two factions over whether the Tamaskan Dog has recent wolf content in it. The breed founders claim that there is no recent wolf content and the other group claims that there is wolf content and that the founders are lying. Tamaskanwolfdog is very likely part of the second group. The user createdTamaskan wolf dog, which was quickly put up for deletion at AFD. Since the user could provide any third-party sources, the article was deleted.Coaster1983 (talk) 18:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
I would like to move forward with our agreed upon actions in this case. I dont consider this matter resolved and dont want to see this case fall through the cracks. Thanks in advance for your help. Bonewah (talk) 14:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that last December, you blocked user:Chacufc. I have reason to believe that he is back as user:Blockski because, 1) He vandalized Charles' page, and 2) He edited a page that Chacufc was editing but being reverted by Charles on... Could you look at that? Thanks! The Arbiter★★★ 22:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to weigh in on my RfA. It was successful, in that the community's wish not to grant me the tools at this time was honored. I'm taking all the comments as constructive feedback and hope to become more valuable to the project as a result; I've also discovered several new areas in which to work. Because debating the merits of a candidate can be taxing on the heart and brain, I offer this kitten as a low-allergen, low-stress token of my appreciation. --otherlleft 14:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
Stuff a cork in the lad, would you? HalfShadow 02:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Bdanthony (talk · contribs), fresh off their block, is back at it again. 76.102.12.35 (talk) 02:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Phil, I recently requested that Nintendo Zone be deleted as a copyright infringement, which you promptly deleted. Looking at it now, I believe it would be adequate to redirect the page to Nintendo World Store, but since its protected, I can't. Could you please unprotect the page, or perhaps just create the redirect, but leave it protected, to prevent the re-addition of the copyrighted material. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
How was that non free; it was my image of my TV and wasn't it a blank screen? As I recall it was blank and so was the PIP channel. So why was it deleted and why was I not warned? Daniel Christensen (talk) 06:39, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm curious why closed this discussion as delete and then deleted the image? The image was being used in an article.--Rockfang (talk) 02:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
why deleted my page? I used hangon template, I'm contesting deletion --Di Natale Massimo (talk) 17:19, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. It might be a good idea to watch out for the Sarah-Jane Hilliard article to be recreated. Amsaim (talk) 17:20, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi... I'm involved with an Article for Deletion discussion that desperately needs some independent opinion. I've been out of touch with Wikipedia lately and I'm stuck for people to turn to so I've just been going through my watchlist to find people to ask. Anyway, the issue is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Grays Harbor. Please feel free to tell me that I'm totally in the wrong, I just want to get some clarity on the situation. Thanks! PageantUpdater talk • contribs 00:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
I am an undergraduate student at UC Berkeley conducting a research project dealing with bureaucratic justice. I was hoping someone at Wikimedia/Wikipedia/Wikipedia Foundation could give me some QUICK guidance that would greatly help me in my search for a viable case study.
I am looking for a large organization, like Wikipedia, that regularly receives claims of harm or injustice against it, then analyze the way in which it responds to such claims (i.e. programs, mechanisms for dealing with those claims) and finally discover how well that organization has done in reducing the number of such claims over time.
While Wikipedia provides much of its mediation/arbitration/dispute-settlement information online, I would still need an actual contact within Wiki's formal dispute resolution apparatus who could provide me some personalized context. Would it be possible to obtain your email address for this purpose? I am an inexperienced wiki user an I do not know how to get your email address off your user page, if it is even listed there. Thank you.PS150Researcher1 (talk) 05:04, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
This is about our mediation case; Bonewah posted to RSN, I linked from the List talk page, but on RSN we got 3 short responses, no consensus, and a week since anyone said anything. Could we ask you, as our mediator, to ask RSN folks to weigh in a bit more, or maybe you have other suggestions? Thanks. --GRuban (talk) 14:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
I hope I opened the case correctly (not sure). Thanks. John Hyams (talk) 07:23, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I was trying to verify that File:Arif solak BanazHamambogazi1.jpg was indeed uploaded to Commons, per your comment on the FFD nomination, but it was closed too soon. The link provided wasn't to the same image, and I couldn't find it in the uploader's contributions. If it wasn't moved over there, I would be willing to crop and move it. Let me know, thanks. — Bility (talk) 07:49, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello! I'm sorry for asking this menial favor, however, I would appreciate it. You see, the article Google Sidewiki used to be a redirect. I took it and created the article that stands there today. The issue was, that because of Wikipedia's automated article creation counters, I don't get credit (from the Toolserver thing). I came to you because you declined the speedy delete and I would like some guidance on what to do. Thank you!-- iBen (talk) 02:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I am wondering if you could please help with the Alsatian Shepalute page. You see, the breed club and founder have recently changed the name of the breed and I am wondering if the references to the breed club I've sited are reliable enough to warrant a redirect to a new page. There is debate and I would really appreciate your thoughts. Thank you for your time. Shepaluteprez (talk) 06:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
I don't want you to be surprised to find that i reversed the Dab deletion at Metal Gear and move from Metal Gear (series), which you carried out pursuant to a ((db-move)) G6, placed by User:Zxcvbnm, that also claiming "[obviously] unnecessary Dab". I am certain that you would have rejected the speedy if you had realized that
I have been too busy evading alligators to have drained that swamp even to the level of being sure whether there are only two contending sides in the matter, but it is clear that even if there are more, the issues are heavily entangled and speedy-requests re the related pages are a further disruption of the already horrible breach of collegiality and process.
Thanks.
--Jerzy•t 09:24, 23 February 2010 (UTC)