Hi RamRaghubn! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! GermanJoe (talk) 09:00, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit to List of people from Thiruvananthapuram appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 09:00, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello RamRaghubn, thank you for your interest in improving Wikipedia. But please do not remove sourced information, unless you dispute the reliability of these sources or have other reliable sources with differing information. Anyway, for such disputes about sourced content it is usually better to initiate a discussion on article talk first, to get feedback from other editors and to gather consensus for possibly controversial changes. If you have questions about editing Wikipedia, I recommend to ask at WP:Teahouse where volunteers will be glad to help. GermanJoe (talk) 09:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I reverted some of this edit you made. Your edit summary incorrectly indicated that there were grammar errors, when I couldn't find any, and even if there had been, we don't fix errors with "narration", whatever that means in this context. I did notice that there was a mistake in identifying the deity, so that fix was constructive, thank you.
Additionally, the references surrounding content you changed is pretty clear that they are talking about cultural beliefs, and it's not clear how "popularized" would be a better word, which sounds like we're talking about the whole world's opinion, vs the opinion of a specific culture, so that statement I restored to "cultural". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:43, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello RamRaghubn, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Attukal Temple have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in complementary and alternative medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
—PaleoNeonate – 16:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
This is with regard to your inclusion of links to pseudoscientific material re the treatment and identification of COVID-19. Before reintroducing this material please discuss on the article's talk page. PainProf (talk) 18:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
From your edit history, it's extremely obvious that you gamed the system to get around the intent of the extended confirmed user access level by issuing hundreds of welcome messages. Don't be disruptive. Ravensfire (talk) 17:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is RamRaghubn - Gaming the system. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 21:12, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
-- 19:00, Tuesday, September 1, 2020 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |