This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:47, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
[1] rootology (C)(T) 17:40, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the fast response with regard to the material added by User:TechAndEthicsIn! Usually it takes some time for admins to analyze a CSD request and the associated behavior, but that was very quick. Thanks again! --Kuzaar-T-C- 14:29, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I've interpreted your comment at ANI to mean I can sort it out, so I have via AN3. Hope that is OK by you William M. Connolley (talk) 22:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I wont stop welcoming, but the welcome will be much smaller. By the way, i changed my signature (my secret was that I created a template and at my prefences put the template name, but then they delted my template)!--RatónBat Talk 2 me!! 18:24, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
on two of the three Alecander Calders' pages.
Carptrash (talk) 21:47, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
I am not affiliated or employed with YTB. I have been interested in the travel industry and noticed that the YTB wikipedia page was incorrect and had only negative aspects about YTB. So I just wanted to add a few positive things and correct the incorrect information. The information that is currently displayed is incorrect information about YTB. The information that I added is correct information I gathered from numerous articles and directly from the YTB's Investor Relations website.
Don't you want the correct info? Laura (talk)
And yes, my name is Laura Holmes. What does that have to do with anything. If you would like to verify my information that I posted to make sure it is correct, please do so. The information you had was incorrect. Visit http://www.ytbi.com to verify. I really don't understand why wikipedia doesn't want the correct information?
I would also like to point out that if you read the information about YTB, it is all negative information that has been added by their competitors to make them look bad. So isn't that a conflict of interest?
Hi. I'm a contributor in the UK and I'm just letting you know that I'm about to re-create Parkwood Hills which you deleted in 2007. I have some friends in Parkwood Hills, regular local residents, who want to join Wikipedia and contribute to a page on their locality. I'll re-create the page for them, and put a few basics on it to help prevent immediate deletion. I should be most grateful if you could kindly let me know of any problems with the page before any serious deletion-type tagging happens, so that I can help put it right. I note that the reason given for deletion in 07 was notability, and I think I can solve that problem - not easy from the UK! Thanks.--Storye book (talk) 09:38, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey, why the hell would you want to delete my page? I demand a reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElCatalyst (talk • contribs)
Hi YI think you've just deleted an article about Vice Admiral Sir Philip Watson. The artical was deleted due to (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: [www.hmscollingwoodofficersassociation.co.uk/thegreenie/chapter14.htm]) I have asked HMS Collingwood Officers Association for permission to use the extract and they have said yes. If you need a copy of the email to prove this please let me know.
Daniel (in UK) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danieldenham (talk • contribs)
I had created an AfD for it. I meant to PROD it, but I clicked onxfd on Twinkle insted. Can you close the Afd now? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:23, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:05, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
this is one of the European Noe. The other Network_of_Excellence have pages on WP, could you please inform yourself before removing... Zacharewicz (talk) 13:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I understand, but we are european non profit research laboratory. I will try to provide licence. Can you help us, thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacharewicz (talk • contribs)
Maybe if i give just a short description of Interop VLAB European Laboratory activities, it can be ok?Zacharewicz (talk) 14:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
What is a legend ? was nominated for RfD. Since you redirected it, I thought there might be a chance you would be interested in the discussion. Cheers! ~ Amory (user • talk • contribs) 17:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Boatingwa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Just thought you might like to know that Laura Holmes appears to be back, this time posing as User:Boatingwa. Of course I have no proof, it could in fact be a different user who just happened to appear right after the sockpuppet investigation, has only edited Talk:YourTravelBiz.com, and has the same writing style. Rees11 (talk) 19:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Zulualpha (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Another one. Again, I could be wrong, but... Rees11 (talk) 20:53, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Point taken, I am now going through those who have added content and welcoming based on the content made. Rmosler | ● 14:16, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:46, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your intervention. Its wonderful that you protected the page. That way it will be stable. And I apologize that I did get a little carried away by that comment. I was upset that someone can be uncivil without assuming any good faith directly. --Legolas (talk2me) 10:51, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 12:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Please take a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Postdeleter. I think its a WP:DUCK case, and, since you blocked the original account you might want to block the sock.—Kww(talk) 17:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:48, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for that, since my last edit nothing has been cited, is it ok if I revert right back to that edit? (Off2riorob (talk) 09:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC))
Why did you call my additions to the Human Rights Watch page vandalism and locked me out? I think the other guys are vandalizing by removing all information that is critical of HRW. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.57.187.186 (talk • contribs)
The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:52, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
I can't figure out all the wiki processes (3rd party, RFC, etc) and what to do first, second, etc. Could you help with assessing this situation? The comments I put at the Admin Notice Board were my intro to the situation. I also requested several days ago the input from well know autism article editors SandyGeorgia and Eubuldies but the tendentious editor isn't waiting for them, nor for the matter to be discussed in Talk before in the Article. WOnderin gif you can help with this process. Sandy and Eubl know about this film Autism Every Day and the various discussions about it. The editors statements and interpretations of text are very poor...please see my comments at the articles Talk (links provided at my Admin Notice Board post.--GzRRk 4 (talk) 22:23, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi and thanks for this block. I just wanted to be sure you noticed that this is the same person who has already been blocked for 3 months for abuse as you can see at User talk:24.229.244.235 and User talk:24.229.233.239 based on talk page posts and interests. The person was also blocked at User talk:Kikimaya123456789 for editing around a block. Nothing whatsoever has changed with the change in IP being used. Just wanted you to know it won't change after 72 hours and technically, it's editing in violation of a block. Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)