Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit when you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cer sequence.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- ^t numbermaniac ^c 05:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Rezarj, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adjuvant may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• countries after vaccination in 2009 due to [[H1N1]] “swine flu” pandemic. <ref name="Masoudi2014">{{cite journal|last=Masoudi|first=Sanita|author2=Daniela Ploen|author3= Katharina Kunz|year=2014|
• that autoimmunity may arise in genetically susceptible individuals. <ref name="Masoudi2014">{{cite journal|last=Masoudi|first=Sanita|author2=Daniela Ploen|author3= Katharina Kunz|year=2014|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Rezarj. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Cer sequence".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)) or ((db-g13)) code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: ((subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cer sequence)), paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:48, 17 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, thank you for thanking me. Is there a way to read Wikipedia interpersonal messages (email?)?

Lehasa (talk) 21:56, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Septum may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *The boundary which is formed between dividing cells in the course of [[cell division.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:03, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:

• Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
• You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
• We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
• Lastly, why not try and strive to create a good article! Anatomical articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:04, 14 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have declined your proposed deletion and turned the page into a redirect. I agree with your rationale but the virus seems to be referred to in numerous popular outlets by variations of this name so it seemed a possible search term; also it helps to prevent some other good-faith contributor coming along and duplicating the article under this name. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 10:48, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. That makes sense. Rezarj (talk) 17:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Viral synapse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HSV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We at Wikipedia love evidence-based medicine. Please cite high-quality reliable sources. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. WP:MEDHOW walks through editing step by step. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:25, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thanks for taking the time to write to me. But I am fully aware of this. I only cite articles from peer-reviewed scientific journals with a high impact factor. I noticed that you have reverted one of my edits [1]. Could you please explain why you think a review article from the Journal of Immunology is not a high-quality reliable source? --Rezarj (talk) 13:52, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please note that REVIEW articles are not the same as PEER reviewed articles. You used a peer reviewed article that is not a review article. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am aware of the difference between the two. But thank you for taking the time to explain. However, is there a specific reason for preferring a review article over a primary article? Because in the introduction and the conclusion section of the article that I used, in addition to the main point of the study, there is a concise critical review from other articles, specifically supporting the statement that I used the citation for. --Rezarj (talk) 20:21, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Don't worry. I read the page for high-quality reliable sources again. I just learnt that that primary sources are not allowed for medical content in Wikipedia. --Rezarj (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]