This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rpsugar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not threatened legal action. What I posted was a past event that brought in Wiki lawyers over this issue and could again, if the editors continue to insist on using wishing to use the authors given name..whatever it might be. She has insisted then and now on using only her Pen name or her recent initialised name for her own privacy and protection. Blocking me for pointing out this past issue and it's potential for occurring again is not a valid excuse. I am not threatening legal action myself, as this is not about ME. I am not the one who could initiate such an action, as occurred in the past and should be a warning to editors and admins.

Decline reason:

You have failed to respond to my request for detailed assurances, indeed you have failed to indicate any comprehension of WP:NLT. By copying deleted threads, you once again posted your legal threat on this talk page. Your unblock request has been denied, and furthers are not going to be considered until and unless you change. Because of your talk page misconduct, you will no longer be allowed to edit this page. Regretfully, Jclemens (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.