![]() |
In the area? You're invited to | |
San Francisco Meetup 3 | ||
Date: September 16th, 2007 | ||
Place: Yerba Buena Gardens, 3pm | ||
San Francisco Meetup 2 |
- Leonard G. 02:43, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Sam. I've noticed that you've removed categories from several images (or images from categories? :-) with a request "Please don't categorize images in non-image categories". On what basis do you make that request? I've looked and the not found any policy/guideline to that effect. In fact:
I find the categorizations quite useful. Thanks, Saintrain 23:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC) (ps. I'm watching here if you want to reply here.)
Hi Sam, per our conversation, this is the BLP I was talking about. It's been calm for a bit, but a look at the history will show the nature of the slime machine to which this serious scholar and perfectly decent man has been subjected at our hands.Proabivouac 06:16, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey, welcome to the Films WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add ((User WikiProject Films)) to your user page.
A few features that you might find helpful:
There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 07:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 23:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
See here. I don't actually have time, but might make time if things started moving on that again. Are you still interested in seeing something like category intersection implemented? Carcharoth 16:04, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Sam. I made a comment on the categorization article talkpage that you may be interested in [1]. Regards Hal Cross 04:20, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
You should be aware that User:Hal Cross is using your comments on Wikipedia talk:Categorization to imply that you support his position in a content dispute. See [2] and [3] for examples. Orpheus 12:22, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered on 17:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC).
I think we could use some more guidance in finding a solution to this. I feel like we're getting the category issue wrong on one hand, but on the other I actually think they are homophobic. I also feel like no one is really listening to anyone on the talk page anymore. I originally sided (for lack of a better word) with Hal which was very painful for me to do. My position changed when we began discussing the AFA and their involvement in the debate about homophobia in general. Well, the talk page has, unfortunately, degenerated back to most of the contributors saying the AFA is clearly homophobic and there is no controversy to the category and Hal saying that's not true and everyone else agrees. I'm trying to take a step back, because defending the AFA and Hal is leaving a bitter taste in my mouth. Any suggestions? AniMate 22:12, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for stepping in - hopefully this will put an end to the volumes of unproductive discussion. Several editors have been asking that the discussion stop until new/salient points are raised, but to no avail. I would ask that you change one of your "rules" - we cannot work towards an NPOV version of the article accepted by everyone - that's far too broad. We should be working towards an NPOV version of the article that is accepted by a consensus as fitting the relevant policy. --Cheeser1 19:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Just in case you notice, the above was created by another using to move warnings from his page toi yours. I moved it back and deleted the fake archive. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I'm interested in getting the Superman article unblocked at least temporarily because at some point someone wrote 'revert back' and that really bugs me. That's a redundancy and I'd like to go and take care of it. Whenever anyone says 'revert back' or 'reflect back' or 'report back' I go absolutely nuts. All I'd like to do is go in there and get that redundant word 'back' out. Thanks for your time. Argentarthropod 22:56, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
How can I edit the redundant word/s out when there is no place to click on to edit? There is no [edit] to click on. Argentarthropod 21:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC) Sorry, I was definitely logged in when I tried that, and as I said, there was nothing to click on so I could edit. Argentarthropod 22:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Fine, whatever. Argentarthropod 22:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Sam, I can't make it any clearer than repeating the there was nothing for me to click on to edit. I thought that was pretty clear. At the Batman page, which you had also semiprotected, there was something for me to click on so I could edit, but not on the Superman page. My problem with this is that, even though you're not a comics fan, you took it upon yourself to semiprotect the Superman and Batman pages. You admit no one asked you to. You stated that you would unsemiprotect them upon request, but when I made the request, you refused. You rather curtly instructed, not asked, me to take my problem elsewhere. I wasn't curt or unfriendly to you. All I can say at this point is that I'm going to quit viewing these pages if I can't correct something like a grammatical error without crawling to you and begging for permission. I don't own a computer and my time using one at the library is limited. I do have other things to do with my time than diddle around with this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Argentarthropod (talk • contribs) 21:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
The October 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 21:17, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered on 12:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC).
In the spirit of doing something useful instead of arguing, how's this for a first pass at the homophobia debate section we discussed before? [4]. Orpheus 06:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Oh, and I never did back to you with my directory of deleted stuff ... here it is User:ProveIt/index -- Prove It (talk) 14:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello Sam,
Sorry, I did not notice that you were taking a wiki break. Thanks anyway for sorting my mess out. I do believe that it IS a fair use...
Anyway, talk to you when you get back.
astragale 07:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 15:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't think this should be a guideline; Wikipedia has plenty of pages in Wikipedia namespace that are simply information pages. If you feel strongly about this, please open a discussion on the talk page, and post a note at WP:VPP that you're proposing to change the page to a guideline. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
The November 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:21, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
File:Red leaves wreath transparent bg.png The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter File:Red leaves wreath transparent bg.png | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered on 20:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 21:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Meta rename done - cheers --Herby talk thyme 12:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)