Re: Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 September 9#Television stations with slashes
... Right after the one for "...zing!". Sorry if that came off as unpleasant in any way, it just seemed that there wasn't a good response to be made to the question (i.e. one that wouldn't ruin the whole thing). siafu 00:58, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
Hi,
I know stub-sorting is monotonous, but you had this fellow pegged as a chess-player, when he was, in fact, a master of bridge. I have restubbed him as bio-US, since we don't seem to have a bridge stub. Thanks. Xoloz 04:14, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
is now a redlink. I figure I have no conflict of interest in closing a unanimous debate. I was reluctant to protect the article during an AfD in case someone should come along and want to re-write it as often happens. I've added the now-deleted article to my watchlist and will speedy it if it resurfaces. Could you add it to yours too, and poke me if I miss it. -Splashtalk 00:19, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
Hi I have changed the proposed title of the rename to Category:Jewish classical musicians with the agreement of User:Lulu_of_the_Lotus-Eaters (who first proposed the rename) as this fits the people who I have placed in the category so far. The category will then be moved as a sub category of the existing categories Category:Jewish_musicians or Category:Jewish_music. I intend to make other categories for the other genres i.e. Jewish pop musicians, Jewish jazz musicians etc. I hope this is OK and doesn't affect your vote Arnie587 16:16, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
Could you please examine the sig in the Olav Reiersøl section of my talk page? The history indicates another user, but the sig directs here. -Splashtalk 11:54, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
why would you want rename this cat when all similar cats for people from/of states and provinces are named as the latter as the former was?? if you check Category:Writers by state and all similar cats such as Category:Ontario actors, Category:Quebec sportspeople for occupation or occupation field by name for any state or provincial you ll find them named thus. moreover, in what way does the new name adds anything specifics or remove any ambiguity semantically. -Mayumashu 14:44, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
The stuff on the talk page assumes that we don't want historical stuff in the template. But historical stuff makes it better. WP:IAR. --SPUI (talk) 20:15, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
The thing is that those two interurbans used the L - they relate more to the L than the commuter rail lines. --SPUI (talk) 02:40, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on the template page. Not sure why SPUI is so adamant about the point without anything to say in the talk pages. Tedernst 08:46, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
You, or any Wikipedia user, can contribute your suggestions and comments to the /Workshop page of any active arbitration case. Comments on evidence or proposals can help in understanding the import of evidence and in refining proposals. Proposed principles, findings of fact, or remedies may be listed on /Proposed decision and form part of the final decision. Fred Bauder 19:25, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
This message is being placed on the talk pages of all members of Association of Members advocates, both as a general invitation and as a reminder that using the /Workshop page may be useful in advocacy. Fred Bauder 19:32, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for supporting me on the eccentric category. I would really appreciate your comment or vote at Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Jewish_American_actors. There is a real problem with this category and similar ones as mixing ethnicity-nationality-profession in categories is in my opinion extremely bad for the category structure. The main reason for this is many people are being added to these xxx American categories for having one grandparent of that ethnicity, therefore they can be in four xxx American categories. If we allow the ethnicity-nationality-profession mix in categories, for example, for someone who has grandparents of four different ethnicities and two professions i.e. actor and director, they could end up in four xxx American actor categories and four xxx American director categories which in my opinion would make Wikipedia look ridiculous. In my opinion this category should be merged with Category:American actors. Thanks Arniep 21:21, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Please consult a map before you make bold assumptions. Research: community area map. #3 is Uptown, #6 is Lake View.
Yeah, but the article mentioned his name as Temuge earlier, so I thought a uniform spelling of his name would be better. Olorin28 12:12, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi - I was wondering why you removed the comment from Neptune with the note that it was false. Doesn't matter, as it was only an internal comment line, but as far as I know, brown dwarfs are not expected to be much larger (in volume) than Jupiter, even if much more massive. kwami 19:19, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
The information I wrote on An Shihkao (including the name transliteration) is how it appears on the reference given. I only paraphrased to avoid copyright problems. You are certainly free to add referenced material to the article as I did, of course.--Zereshk 22:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
You said you would change your vote if I populated the categories with 5 people each. After I did exactly that you withdrew your vote instead of changing it. --Vizcarra 22:38, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Hello, you are receiving this message because your name is on the list of members of the Association of Members' Advocates. There is a poll being held at Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates for approval of a proposal for the revitalisation of the association. You are eligible to vote and your vote and input are welcome. Izehar 22:30, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
You might want to check out these two edits to Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 January 9. It looks like someone might be faking votes from you. - dcljr (talk) 02:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your vote in the ArbCom elections. I see that I have confused you with my "reluctance to stand". I wanted to keep to 250 words in the opening statement so couldn't elaborate, but I'm happy to do so here. The reluctance was, as I said, because ArbCom is likely to be an arduous duty and will take away from the time I'm able to spend writing articles. It isn't because I am in any way equivocal about wanting to serve on ArbCom. I enjoy the practice of weighing the evidence and trying to reach consensus, and feel that serving on ArbCom I would be making a very positive contribution to Wikipedia. I hope this solves your confusion - but if you want to discuss it, please send me a message. David | Talk 00:05, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Noting your last Delete vote, have you seen Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_January_12#Category:Films_notable_for_historical_inaccuracy? Please consider voting Speedy delete. Thanks.--Mais oui! 03:09, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi. As an editor who participated in the discussion regarding renaming Category:United States Students' Unions, I am writing you to let you know that while there was consensus to rename the category there was no clear consensus for the final name. If you would like to revisit the discussion on Category talk:United States Students' Unions I am willing to consider an agreement there and rename the category. I won't be monitoring your talk page so if you have to reply to me directly please do so on my talk page. Thanks! --Syrthiss 19:52, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
The Black Gangsters category was put up for deletion again; I believe unfairly since no note of the previous discussion was given. Finding that you voted before, and believing you made a well-reasoned argument, I ask that you vote again here. [1] --Alsayid 19:49, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Your comments are requested at Category talk:Fictional octopi and squids regarding whether it would be best to move this to Category:Fictional octopuses and squids or Category:Fictional cephalopods. (I'm telling you this because you voted on the category's cfd.) All the best, – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 20:17, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi there, Variable. Please see Talk:Atmospheric reentry#Disambiguation and bypassing redirects. Thanks, David Iberri (talk) 00:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Hey there. Just letting you know that the War on Drugs article has been nominated for improvement. Perhaps you may want to add your supporting vote or a comment on the process. Thank you and take care. --Howrealisreal 18:13, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I grabbed all 3 of the recent IP edits and checked the difference, but when I rolled it back I forgot that there were two different IPs there. tv316 22:58, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
What are you doing with the Genghis Khan article? Don't make bold assumption without sources and don't revert stuff if you feel it's nonsensical.
I understand that sometimes uncivilized editors are hard to deal with, but they can only be shut up with cold and hard facts. Let us continue to try to bring Genghis Khan to feature-article status. It definitely deserves being a feature article Olorin28 23:49, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Why are people trying to change Parthia to Parthia Empire now?Zmmz 22:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
I thought you settled that question quite a while ago when you involved everyone in the discussion page? Good job though, because I saw someone even inserted Ashkanian in there.Zmmz 22:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC)