Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
DGG ( talk ) 02:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)- I accepted it, but I did a good deal of work to rewrite it in a neutral tone. I am one of the admins here who tend to specialize in academics, and I'm used to this sort of rewriting, but I could equally well have deleted it for blatant promotionalism. WP articles are supposed to be encyclopedic , not press releases. I still need to clean up the publication list--you might want to make sure you have selected the most cited articles--and give the number of citations. DGG ( talk ) 02:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Björn Ottersten has been accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 02:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC)