Hello, I'm Bobrayner. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Vladimir Djordjevic (martial artist) because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. bobrayner (talk) 01:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:19, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Denniss/Sandbox3. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 09:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Denniss/Sandbox, you may be blocked from editing. Denniss (talk) 18:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Denniss. Jim1138 (talk) 18:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing and vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)). However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acather96 (click here to contact me) 20:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Siptarski editori wikipedije, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 20:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

The article in which you are interested was deleted according to Wikipedia's proposed deletion process. This means that the request of anyone, including yourself, is sufficient to have the article restored, which I will do shortly. Basically, proposed deletion is shortened process, where articles are deleted without a full debate. This restoration does not ensure that the article will remain permanently, though. All Wikipedia articles must demonstrate notability according to reliable sources, and all articles must be written in neutral tone. The person who asked for the deletion of Odbrana (tactical defense system) expressed concerns about whether the topic was notable according to reliable sources, and whether the article was sufficiently neutral in tone. After I restore the article, any editor may call for a full debate on whether the article meets Wikipedia's guidelines. If you have any other questions, I'll be happy to assist you. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 03:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

As before, I have restored the article on Mr. Djordevic after your request. The same concerns about reliable sources are likely to be raised against his article as against Odbrana (which is currently undergoing an articles for deletion debate.) These article simply need more reliable sources in order to remain in the encyclopedia. Webpages which appear to be affiliated commercially with Odbrana or Mr. Djordjevic are simply not considered reliable, according to the Wikipedia's definition of the term. If reliable sources cannot be found, it may be that Odbrana and Mr. Djordjevic simply do not meet the requirements of Wikipedia's notability guidelines. There is no shame in this. As time passes, if the martial art and the instructor continue to grow in renown, reliable sources will eventually appear. If you know of other books, journals, or websites which meet the requirements of a reliable source, add them to article. That is the best advice I can give. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 20:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ODBRANA - Tactical Defense System / Hand To Hand Combat, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.potiori.com/Odbrana_(tactical_defense_system).html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:16, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]