manavyAḷakinca rAdaṭE
marmamella telpedanE manasA
ghanuḍaina rAma candruni
karuṇAntaraṅgamu telisina nA (manavi)
karma kAṇḍa matAkṛṣṭulai bhava
gahana cArulai gAsi jendaga
kani mAnavAvatAruḍai
kanipiñcinAḍE naḍata tyAgarAju (manavi)

— Tyagaraja

Yes, I do suffer from something of what the Japanese called a hōgan-biiki (判官贔屓) empathy in my approach to the world. It does influence what attracts my attention, meaning I sympathise with the silenced underdog in so many conflicts, be they Aboriginals or Palestinians or Tibetans. This as far as I am aware does not translate into being uncomfortable with my country of origins, or antisemitic, or hostile to Chinese. From distinct backgrounds, I gather, several editors share this interest and they tend to work well together because they subscribe to the same principles of evidence which are commended in academia as they are on wikipedia as ideals.

— Nishidani, en-wiki

Archives

Talk, 2021, 2022, list

• Ruhnama - Low priority.
• Hasmukh Dhirajlal Sankalia - Low priority.
• The Story of Civilization - High priority.
• R. C. Majumdar - Medium priority.
• Satish Chandra Mittal - Low priority.
• Fronda
• Waldemar Chrostowski
• Ryszard Bender
• Zdzisław Krasnodębski (sociologist)
• Antoni Dudek
• Dariusz Jarosz

To Read

• THE EVOLUTION OF ANTLER AND BONE CHEEKPIECES FROM THE BALKAN-CARPATHIAN REGION TO CENTRAL KAZAKHSTAN: CHRONOLOGY OF “CHARIOT” CULTURES AND MYCENAEAN GREECE
• Politics, gender, and the Islamic past: The Legacy of ʻAʼisha bint Abi Bakr

I contributed enough to nominate the History of Mizoram article (or atleast I think so). Can you tell me anything majorly wrong with the article in discussion that caused it to be reverted, I don't think you are supposed to even revert it. Instead i think you are supposed to review it and give it a failure and explain why. Sangsangaplaz (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@RegentsPark: Can you please let Sangsangaplaz understand why History of Mizoram shall not even be considered for a GA or why they, with absolutely no record of any content work, ought not do any GA review esp. for Muhammad of Ghor and Sher Shah Suri. I wrote a message at their t/p but that was deleted. Thanks, TrangaBellam (talk) 09:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Btw, unless your edits have been redacted (?), all I see in the article-history is a single trivial edit. And, WP:GAN says, Any significant contributor to an article may nominate it. TrangaBellam (talk) 09:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No redacted edits and only one trivial edit to the page. @Sangsangaplaz:, you should probably find something else to focus on. RegentsPark (comment) 14:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@RegentsPark@TrangaBellam Sorry ot was a test nominatio. Sangsangaplaz (talk) 11:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Tranga, I hope that you are not too occupied with other tasks to take a look at this request. I wanted you to take a look at this article, which I believe is problematic in many way as it romanticises a legendary folklore as history. I am not too familiar with processes of removing problematic information appropriately but have noticed that are quite active with solving a lot of these issues pertaining to India-related articles. I would like to see what you think, as majority of the information is not from reliable sources at all. It seems to be a way of presenting legends in the guise of a reliable historical article and it bugs me because I know this is the case but it's not easy for me to make that clear to those who are not familiar with the romanticisation of historical conflicts in India. I don't know where a lot that which is mentioned in the article is actually from. I would appreciate your taking a look at this but if you are too occupied, then please remove this message as a heads up so I know to ask elsewhere. Thank you. Muydivertido (talk) 19:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That is an atrocious article; perhaps, stub it? TrangaBellam (talk) 09:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I would like to do that, but am not experienced with stubbing and wouldn't want my attempt to be confused by more experienced users as vandalism or removal of content. Please look into it if you have time, thanks. Muydivertido (talk) 19:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, TrangaBellam, I have sought a third opinion regarding the ongoing disagreement. Thanks — Satnam₂₄₀₈^(talk) 15:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Let's shorten the disagreement. I have inquired about Bhaumik multiple times on the article talk page but have not received a response. I believe there is a disagreement about the Skanda Purana and the related section. Bhaumik's input is unrelated to the Skanda Purana and has been accepted by other relevant editors. I removed redundancy and presented it as an opinion or interpretation. Thank you. — Satnam₂₄₀₈^(talk) 04:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]