Hello! I noted your corrections on the sources in this article, and in addition to saying thank you for what you have already done, I wanted to ask if you would do more?! I would like to take this article to FA status, and in order to do that, every source needs to be fully accurate. It took me a year to find them in the first place and it's a lot for one person to recheck alone. I could really use the help. I would be grateful! Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Yes, I plan to finish the design of the sources, but at the moment I’m going to go to bed;) I live in the UTC+4 time zone. As soon as I wake up and get to the computer, I’ll continue. — Werter1995 (talk) 19:33, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bless you! I have sent you a gazillion thank you's already, and it's not enough! I can't possibly thank you enough! I am so overwhelmingly grateful for all you have done. However do you find these? I would like to know how to do what you have done here. All I know to do is slog through them one by one, and since there are over 600, that's a long slog.

I do have one other question in addition to how you work your magic. This Dif [[1]] has Shlomo Lambroza showing up in red, which I think means there is no link, am I correct? I didn't do anything because I wasn't sure, but does that mean that link should be removed?

So I am asleep while you are awake, but that just means I get to wake up to wonderful surprises! That could not be better! This is truly amazing. Thank you. Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I type the person's name into Google search and see if there are any relevant links. Regarding Shlomo Lambroza, see WP:REDLINKS, he is a notability author, and redlink is desirable. — Werter1995 (talk) 07:14, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

One at a time then. WOW. I don't know exactly how it has happened, then, that we have ended up with red links - meaning those pages do not exist. I have had to remove them, but there were only about 6, so no big deal. I still think that this is a great addition that I am genuinely grateful for. Is it possible they are on other WP's not the English WP? That would have to be designated. Whatever happened with those few, this is great work. I never would have done this - so I'm glad you did! Thank you! Jenhawk777 (talk) 23:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No red links allowed in an FA. Jenhawk777 (talk) 23:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is very strange... Werter1995 (talk) 03:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Werter1995: @Jenhawk777: That's not actually true. Per WP:REDDEAL, it's general policy not to remove redlinks without specific cause; if a FAC reviewer gets stinky about it, they're doing it outside of the FA criteria. Generalissima (talk) 06:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The one time I applied for an FA, a reviewer removed them, and told me it is an "informal policy" because they just don't look professional and that's what FA has to look like. Jenhawk777 (talk) 08:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Argh. That's always irritating when reviewers throw in their personal preferences. The only time they're not kosher for FAC is in the lede. Generalissima (talk) 20:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, these articles are not available in other language versions; I searched and provided most of these links. — Werter1995 (talk) 03:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]