These are more complicated than just doing a page move. See WP:UNC Andy Dingley (talk) 16:21, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Visit WP:CHU. There, you can request an account rename. It will be done by a bureacrat. That's the only way. Tutelary (talk) 12:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Zackdickens, I've completed your rename request. Please be sure to use this new name as your username when you log in; if you've been automatically logged in, you may need to log out and log back in with the new username. Also, keep in mind that this rename is only for the English Wikipedia; if you have edits on other wikis, like Commons for example, you may need to request a rename from bureaucrats there and have them re-merge the account into your SUL. Thanks, and happy editing! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 16:35, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Hey I noticed you can login with your old name is that true? →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 16:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
→Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 06:38, 28 April 2014 (UTC) |
→Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 17:07, 28 April 2014 (UTC) |
→Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 17:08, 28 April 2014 (UTC) |
Okay, I've renamed your account again. All the same things apply. Keep in mind, though, that rename requests can be refused on the grounds of too many prior renames. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:31, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Now, learn more about Wikipedia and work on contributing to the project.
Ok and thanks for the robbin. :) →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 07:17, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi Zack. On the article Lorraine (TV programme), I see you have been reverting back and forth with other editors over the showing of two logos. The thing is, that's known as edit warring (which is explained at WP:EW, a page well worth reading) and it will get you blocked if you continue. If you make a change and someone reverts it, you should not re-revert and put it back. What you should instead do if you believe your change is correct is start a discussion on the article talk page and see what the consensus of other editors says. If the consensus is in your favour, you can then (but only then) reinsert your changes. But if the consensus is against you, you must accept that your version is not the one the community wants and walk away from it.
Finally, I see you have been having a few problems generally, and I would urge you to listen to the good advice that more experienced Wikipedia editors have been giving you - Wikipedia can be complicated and you can get into trouble without meaning to, and the best way to avoid that is to learn from the people who know the ropes. I wish you success in your time here. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:02, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Someone close your MFD as I was typing a reply. Talk pages are never deleted unless there is some really obscure reason why they need to. In the 8 years I've been here, I've only seen it a couple of times. There is a reason: we need a history of all communications. In your case, I don't see any reason that even remotely approaches a good reason to delete. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 16:21, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Zack, Talkpages cannot be deleted,
Instead of removing everyones comments here you might actually want to read them since our patience with you is wearing very thin!,
Cheers, →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 16:22, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
I would really like to be unblocked because I can't wait one week. :( →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 16:26, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Don't be nasty BMK :( →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 16:40, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Writ please can you make my block temporary again please. Hmmm. →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 21:00, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
I see you have been tagging your user page with ((pp-move-dispute|expiry=1 April 2015|small=yes)) and you have been reinserting the tags when other editors have removed them. At Template:pp-move-dispute it says "This template should only be used on pages that are move-protected due to disputes". Your user page is not move protected due to disputes, is it? So you should not keep placing the template there, should you? If you do, it puts your user page in a category of pages that require admin attention, and that attracts the attentions of admins who have better things to be doing (not to mention taking up the time of editors reverting you, and my time explaining this to you). Let me be blunt - you need to *stop* your disruptive messing around, or you *will be* blocked from editing. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
I AM NOT WAITING ONE WEEK TO BE UNBLOCKED :( →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 16:31, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
I just posted a comment in response to your request to delete your talkpage, on the MfD page. Since you can't respond there until your block either expires or is lifted, you can post your comment here and I will watch this page for it. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 16:29, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SuperMarioMan ( talk ) 16:30, 8 May 2014 (UTC)ZackDickens12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was mistakes I make mistakes and this was one of them →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 16:33, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
ZackDickens12, as you know, I have left you advice over the past week and watched your progress closely. At this point in time, I am inclined to agree that this block is necessary to prevent any further damage to the project until you engage with other editors and start reading and abiding by the rules and guidelines in place. I am declining this specific request because you have not identified the mistakes you have made that specifically resulted in this block. Additionally, you have a history of brushing away warnings and advice with no change in your editing habits. The last observation I have is that you rarely seek consensus and continue to venue shop until things are your way. You have engaged in numerous edit wars and filed multiple successive requests after being declined. You have been given a considerable amount of rope by myself and other editors and frankly this is it catching up with you. You will have to wait out this block and I would recommend using this time to review all the advice you have received since you started. I would also like to point out that your margin for 'errors and mistakes' as well as conduct towards WP:LISTEN will be much smaller and another block will likely ensue if nothing changes in the way you interact with other editors. As per our policy you are welcome to request another unblock, but I would caution you, as one of the primary concerns is your failure to accept a decision and continue to re-request the same thing over and over, and thus another request may only further that argument against you and work to your detriment. Mkdwtalk 17:56, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
At times I need to blank the page when thing have been solved. →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 16:45, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
My recommendation to you is to slow down and take heed of the advice that other users have posted here. While there is nothing to prevent you from removing other users' messages, please make sure that you understand the content of those messages before reverting. If you are unsure about something, do not hesitate to ask for help. SuperMarioMan ( talk ) 17:06, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
I am not new! I have been here since march 2014! →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 07:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, but you keep thinking I'm 1 day old! →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 10:16, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
ZackDickens12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This was a accident and a mistake. :) →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 09:28, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline, new block has been applied. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 21:10, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ZackDickens12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am so sorry out of everyone I know so please could anyone unblock me? →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 14:29, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 14:50, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ZackDickens12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand what I have been blocked for, I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I will make useful contributions instead. →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 18:34, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your edits under this account have not been constructive, and there is no reason to believe that is going to change Prodego talk 19:31, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
It is going to change I promise out of anyone I know. →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 19:34, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
I am young if someone is young please don't block them. Thanks, →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 09:11, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi and I would like to be a admin. :) →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 10:23, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
I am a editor! →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 10:44, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Doc9871 no more posts about me or here anymore please. →Zackdickens12→→Talk to me!→ 20:45, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Zack, I've upped your block to indefinite. Posting an RfB, of all things, in your userspace while you are blocked shows that none of this is getting through, even if the people who think you're just deliberately trolling are wrong (and I'm beginning to come around to their point of view). I'd suggest the standard offer for an unblock, if you're actually serious about editing Wikipedia; showing that you have the patience to wait six months will be an absolute minimum for showing you have the maturity to edit Wikipedia. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 21:01, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
I've removed the article copy from your user page. That was granted to you while you were temporarily blocked, but as you are now indefinitely blocked, it would be improper to allow this. Do not replace the article or you will force me to remove talk page access altogether. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 14:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Zack, you need to STOP this now! While your block was only a short one, you were allowed to edit articles here on this talk page while waiting for the block to end. Now that your block has been extended to indefinite, you are no longer allowed to do that. I am going to remove it again - if you want to edit war and revert again, go ahead, but my prediction is that an admin will come along and remove your ability to edit this talk page. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:55, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Zack, after your latest, utterly unacceptable outburst, I've revoked your access to your talk page. Any appeals you may want to make in the future will now have to go through the email-based UTRS. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 07:08, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Daybreak (TV programe). Since you had some involvement with the Daybreak (TV programe) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Joeyconnick (talk) 01:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)