Add your questions below the line using the following markup:
#((ACE Question
|Q=Your question
|A=))
"RfC [with] focus on how harassment and private complaints should be handled in the future.". Personally, what particular questions/aspects would you want to see discussed? Along with that, many candidates note a balance to be drawn, but where would you actually draw a line if given the choice?
acts as a final binding decision-marker primarily for serious conduct disputes that the community has been unable to resolve(emphasis mine). There are two points I would like to highlight. First, I'm not quite sure about that "primarily" part (unless, of course, it means nothing more than "there are four more listed responsibilities"). Second, it's left unsaid whether the committee or the community decides whether the community is able to resolve something. Ideally, of course, they agree. But the standard I think I'd follow would be whether a case would be likely to improve the situation, and of course whether all other options have been exhausted or unsuitable. Enterprisey (talk!) 07:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC)