The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 12:01, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

123ContactForm[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable web content; fails WP:NWEB, and really WP:GNG too. Article is cited to two blogs (one is the company's own, the other is designed for promotion of Eastern European startups such as this) and a Yahoo news reprint of a press release, none of which qualify as independent, reliable sources. Further searches didn't turn up anything. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 14:22, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - corporate spam from a single-purpose account; no independent sources attest notability. - Biruitorul ^Talk 05:40, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article edited; kindly take into consideration the following independent references:

http://www.businessinsider.com/web-30-and-social-dancing-romania-emerging-2011-12

http://www.appappeal.com/maps/123contactform

http://www.iblogzone.com/2012/05/123contactform-professional-form-builder.html

Hermielle (talk) 06:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neither the appappeal website (an app directory) nor the iblogzone or the businessinsider site (blogs) count as reliable sources. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 13:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: no indication of notability. The subject is just another B2B company, advertised on Wikipedia. The fact that this article mixes company and product into single abomination doesn't add notability to either of them. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:47, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.