- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
12 Labours of Hercules (video game series)[edit]
- 12 Labours of Hercules (video game series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find video game sources: "12 Labours of Hercules" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)
Fails WP:GNG. Using the video game reliable sources custom Google search engine, it only brings up Metacritic and GameRankings. Not notable. Soetermans. T / C 09:49, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Article is not notable and fails WP:GNG. No reliable sources seem to cover them extensively. AdrianGamer (talk) 12:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Also highly promotional - a trend that is getting really annoying. -- Hybris1984 (talk) 21:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-notable video game series failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. The list does not pass WP:LISTN as a stand-alone list, nor are individual four video games notable. No meaningful hits in custom RS search, primarily directory entries. Even unreliable sources are scarce. The available sources do not provide enough material to write a meaningful article without WP:PLOT and WP:GAMECRUFT and with WP:WAF in mind. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 15:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.