The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Leoluca Orlando. RL0919 (talk) 13:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

139 Movement[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost completely unknown movement, rarely mentioned in some sources only for its founder. The page reads only "The 139 Movement is a political party in Italy led by Leoluca Orlando": in this state it is a useless page. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 12:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The fact that this political party was launched and led by the mayor of one of Italy's largest cities makes it automatically encyclopedic, in my view. Every little piece of political history deserves a space in Wikipedia. Articles like this (the nominator proposed a string of AfDs today) should be clearly improved, but not deleted. Of course, the passing of time makes difficult to find more sources and information in the web, but I will do my best to improve the article. I think it should be kept, anyway. At first glance I see proposed deletions as harmful and time-wasting exercises, but hopfully they could become opportunities for improving articles. --Checco (talk) 19:48, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A party is encyclopedic on the basis of its relevance and notoriety, not on the basis of who launched it. In this case, notoriety is almost non-existent. You know very well that the page cannot be improved. Your assessment of keeping this page is not about the relevance of the page itself, but a position based on the principle that everything can stay on wikipedia. But is not so.--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 21:02, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect to Leoluca Orlando, if its notability derives from this person, it can be covered in the context of this person, particularly if, as the article implies, it is only at the local level. Reywas92^Talk 02:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - I agree with Reywas92. Mommmyy (talk) 16:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per User:Reywas92. Yakme (talk) 08:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge This does not have enough notability to be its own article, but it should be merged PaulPachad (talk) 20:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.