The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The title may be redirected at editorial discretion. Mz7 (talk) 21:18, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

13cm[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This publisher doesn't seem to be notable. The article only cites a single source. Which is an interview and therefore doesn't work for notability. Only two of it's published works have articles, both of which have extremely questionable notability, and I didn't find any in-depth coverage of the company in a WP:BEFORE that would help them pass WP:NCORP. Adamant1 (talk) 00:46, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:17, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:17, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Defunct developer that doesn't meet WP:N. Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) 19:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The name unfortunately makes it hard to look for sources, but I couldn't find anything in a quick google search, either. The article says it's one of Visual Arts' brands, so should be redirected to that.--Alexandra^IDV 09:46, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete sources are not enough to establish notability. --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 19:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.