The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Lack of discussion renders consensus undeterminable. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 03:10, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1911 Census of the North West Frontier Province

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a transcription of a primary source that is known to be unreliable. It includes links to numerous other articles that may or may not in fact be the communities designated in the census. Basically, it is verifiable only due to a failure to comply with WP:RS. Without context, and with the links, it is effectively useless. A similar article by the same creator has already been deleted. See: AfD of 1901 Census of Rajputna. KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 11:44, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 11:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 11:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 11:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blank and redirect to Census in Pakistan, just as it has been done with 1998 Pakistan Census. No need to copy data across. — kashmiri ^TALK 16:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
REdirect to something on censuses in pre-independence India: see comments on 1901 AFD. Peterkingiron (talk) 10:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect targets have been suggested, but more input is needed for a specific target (if the discussion continues in the direction of a redirect result) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note the target I imagine Peterkingiron had in mind was Census of India prior to independence. Uanfala (talk) 21:23, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:03, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply -- That is probably what I had in mind. I also recall discussions that 19th century British censuses in areas like Bihar that had long been under British rule were thoroughly unreliable, because many people managed not to get counted. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:41, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 ^talk 02:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 02:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.