The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. Whilst I appreciate the comments, my personal view would be a merge to the main Yeti article, I see I have been overruled No harm done anyhow. No need for a relist as clearly a keep. (non-admin closure) Nightfury 15:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Yeti Airlines Twin Otter Crash[edit]

2006 Yeti Airlines Twin Otter Crash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Verging on ROTM, may benefit rather than its own article, possibly being merged with Yeti Airlines Nightfury 09:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Nightfury 09:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Nightfury 09:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• If the nominator is suggesting deletion, keep. Scheduled airline crashes involving fatalities are usually considered non-WP:ROTM and worthy of their own articles provided sourcing is available to meet GNG, which this appears to have. If the nominator is suggesting merging, speedy keep per WP:SK1. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:37, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:38, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• 'Keep - scheduled airline flight crashes with loss of all on board. Notable enough event to sustain an article. Mjroots (talk) 17:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.