The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:05, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 ITF Djibouti Open (1)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely should be deleted per tennis project ladies tournament guidelines. "From 2008–2012 the ITF Women's $35,000–$100,000+ tournaments (excluding qualifications) are considered notable. From 1978–2007 the threshold for notability in the women's ITF circuit is a $25,000 event (excluding qualifications). This a tiny little $10,000 tournament of which there are hundreds every year filled with the lowest level pros in tennis. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

other related pages nominated under the same criteria:

Delete all The majority of these definitely don't meet the General notability guidelines, let alone any other guidelines as there are not independent sources to provide notability. There are some independent news sources for 2011 LIC ITF Women's Tennis Championships, but they don't provide sufficient coverage to provide notability or that this is more than just routine reporting of a sporting event.--Mrmatiko (talk) 08:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - lowest level tournaments in pro tennis. (Gabinho^>:) 09:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 12:18, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 12:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - These obviously fail the criteria set by wikiproject Tennis. I can only concur with above editors. MakeSense64 (talk) 14:09, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The pages where not made by me, I just helped. And I do not know how to delete the pages. Keroks (talk) 21:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem there. This IS the way you delete pages. You can't just click and make them go away. Unless it's blatant vandalism we nominate, see what people think, and then delete or keep. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:56, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reckon we should delete them, there is not point of having them where there is red links everywhere. Keroks (talk) 22:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And as I look around, you may not have created these particular non-notable pages but you have created others such as this tournament which in the same way will need to be removed. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm pretty sure Wikipedia is not the place dedicated for them. Readers interested in it can probably find these on the ITF website. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 09:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. 2011 ITF Women's Circuit has sufficient info for such small tournaments, and can link to the draw at the ITF site. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:22, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.