The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus to delete following relisting. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:20, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Irkutsk Antonov An-12 crash[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:AIRCRASH, IT JUST ISN'T NOTABLE AS ANOTHER CARGO AIRCRAFT CRASH with no lasting consequences or changes to procedures, regulations etc. etc., no notable fatalities, no special cargo, absolutely nothing notable!! Petebutt (talk) 13:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 August 14. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 13:28, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable cargo crash....William 10:55, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom, it simply is not notable. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:23, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Although only an essay and not actually a guideline or policy WP:AIRCRASH is a statement of WikiProject Aviation, which advises the inclusion of crash articles which meet three criteria: (1) human fatality AND (2) hull loss AND (3) lasting importance in the form of changes to airline policies and procedures, etc. It also intimates that military crashes are to be presumed less noteworthy than civilian crashes. I think the advice of the work group as to what constitutes "ordinary" catastrophes (i.e., falling afoul of WP:NOTNEWS) and what constitutes a noteworthy event is helpful. If some sort of lasting significance on Russian aviation could be demonstrated, I could easily be flipped. Carrite (talk) 16:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.