The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 South Korea vs Tunisia Football Match[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable match. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. The match has not received significant coverage, nor will it, unless something very extraordinary happens. The article clear fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - hasn't even happened yet. It may be notable after it has been placed - though that it is unlikely. Giant Snowman 12:32, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not a notable match -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - inherently non-notable match as it is a) a friendly and b) has not actually taken place yet. Fenix down (talk) 14:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Utterly non-notable in current state. Admiral Caius (talk) 20:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:V and WP:CRYSTAL. Regarding wp:notability, wp:notability is defined by the topic and not the article. There is no way to know now how notable the topic will be by June 15. The assertion that the match is a "friendly" match is unsourced, so while it may be a predictor, it is unreliable in determining future notability. Unscintillating (talk) 00:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The match is not part of a competition (World Cup, etc), therefore by definition it is a friendly. That's what a friendly is....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:01, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.