The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that while the topic may be newsworthy (i.e. suitable for inclusion in a newspaper), it does not have the lasting significance or persistent coverage expected of a topic that is suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Respectfully, Mz7 (talk) 04:02, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Munich shooting[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable shooting, WP:NOTNEWS, contested prod. WWGB (talk) 14:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Indeed, this is a WP:NOTNEWS event that received a brief wave of coverage, most likely because there were suspicions of a terrorist motive that were quickly dismissed for lack of evidence.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:13, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: creator (User:P.Shiladitya) requested speedy-deletion per WP:CSD#G7, which I declined on policy grounds because User:Autarch had later made substantial additions. DMacks (talk) 01:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe create the broader article Crime in Munich and merge into (as section only). 185.59.158.22 (talk) 14:12, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTNEWS....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTNEWS.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The best explanation I got from @Knowledgekid87:, which is available on my t@lk page. However, if anybody (e.g. IP:185.59.158.22) has a problem, he/she may create it on wikinews (It would be helpful for me if @TheGracefulSlick: would explain why it is WP:NOTNEWS). And I think, @Knowledgekid87: Sir can give better suggestion than me. Thanking you - P.Shiladitya^✍talk 22:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

P.Shiladitya to answer your question, this shooting is WP:NOTNEWS because the media coverage it received was brief and did not establish a notable WP:LASTING impact suitable for a standalone article. I suspect it received as much attention as it did because of suspected terrorist-related motives, a "popular" topic for most news agencies. That is one of the issues any editor will have to deal with when writing about a breaking news event: You are not completely certain if the subject has significant impact or long-term coverage beyond some WP:ROUTINE reports.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:29, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.