Deletion SortingProject (talk)Project page Lists (by ABC) Lists (by topic) Lists (computer-readable) AfD: Today, Yesterday Delsort scripts .mw-parser-output .navbar{display:inline;font-size:88%;font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .navbar-collapse{float:left;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .navbar-boxtext{word-spacing:0}.mw-parser-output .navbar ul{display:inline-block;white-space:nowrap;line-height:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::before{margin-right:-0.125em;content:"[ "}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::after{margin-left:-0.125em;content:" ]"}.mw-parser-output .navbar li{word-spacing:-0.125em}.mw-parser-output .navbar a>span,.mw-parser-output .navbar a>abbr{text-decoration:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-mini abbr{font-variant:small-caps;border-bottom:none;text-decoration:none;cursor:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-full{font-size:114%;margin:0 7em}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-mini{font-size:114%;margin:0 4em}vte

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Crime. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add ((Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName)) to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding ((subst:delsort|Crime|~~~~)) to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove links to other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Crime.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch

This list includes sublists of deletion debates on articles related to Wikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography.

See also: Social science-related deletions.

Crime[edit]

2024 shooting of Sonoma County sheriff's deputies

2024 shooting of Sonoma County sheriff's deputies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just another of many shootings in the US. No fatalities other than the shooter. No ongoing media interest after one week. WWGB (talk) 06:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. nothing to say besides the fact it happened PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 08:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Davies (headmaster)

Alan Davies (headmaster) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not convinced of notability here. I don't think that everyone who has been stripped of their knighthood is notable enough. BangJan1999 21:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Burkhard Garweg

Burkhard Garweg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think that this article should be reverted to its pre-existing redirect to Members_of_the_Red_Army_Faction#Third_generation_Red_Army_Faction_(1982–1993) on WP:BLPCRIME and GNG considerations. In contrast to other 3rd generation RAF members Daniela Klette and Ernst-Volker Staub, Garweg has not actually been convicted of any crime. Coverage is fleeting, exclusively in the context of suspected activities in the third-generation RAF, and the stronger of the cited sources, Der Spiegel solely frames criminal charges against Garweg beyond association with the third-generation RAF in attribution to the authorities rather than as statements of fact, as well as stating that little is known about Burkhard Garweg (Über Burkhard Garweg ist nur wenig bekannt). signed, Rosguill talk 15:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rape of Donetsk People's Republic soldiers by Kadyrovites

Rape of Donetsk People's Republic soldiers by Kadyrovites (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability. WP:NOTNEWS. Can be merged into Sexual violence in the Russian invasion of Ukraine if necessary. Speedied in ruwiki for С5: no evidence of encyclopedic significance. Deleted in ukwiki for NOTNEWS.  — 魔琴 (Zauber Violino) talk contribs ] 08:09, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as a brief note to the suggested page. Not significant enough for more than that. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Majid Dastjani Farahani

Majid Dastjani Farahani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Case of WP:BLP1E: "Being in the news does not in itself mean that someone should be the subject of a Wikipedia article". Per BLP1E we should avoid having articles on individuals that reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event. Also relevant is WP:SUSPECT: "For individuals who are not public figures...editors must seriously consider not including material—in any article—that suggests the person has committed or is accused of having committed a crime, unless a conviction has been secured." AusLondonder (talk) 17:14, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don Carter Lanes shooting

Don Carter Lanes shooting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable crime. After the immediate burst of coverage following the event, there has not been WP:SUSTAINED coverage sufficient for notability (only a few local sources, mostly about the trial; this is typical for most crimes and does not indicate notability). Elli (talk | contribs) 05:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, there is basically nothing to say besides "it happened" and that is it. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:50, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cincinnati FBI field office attack

Cincinnati FBI field office attack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:EVENT. No lasting WP:EFFECT. Almost all the sources provided are from August 2022. LibStar (talk) 02:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This definitely fails sustained and should not have its own article but I feel like given the political motivation there's a plausible redirect target somewhere, where it can be briefly noted. However I am unable to come up with a good one :/ PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Still doesn't fulfill sustained but redirect to its section at FBI search of Mar-a-Lago, the closest claim to notability it has is as a reaction to that plus it's mentioned there already PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as creator - The article is sufficiently notable because the incident was an attack on a federal agency, was committed in response to a significant event (the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago), resulted in an hours-long chase and standoff and multiple road closures, had widespread media coverage, and prompted statements by multiple prominent public figures. The article itself is detailed enough that it would be difficult to merge into another article without losing significant details. --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 10:59, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting and to see what editors think of the Redirect proposal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:48, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2015 attack on Dallas police

2015 attack on Dallas police (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:EVENT, only 1 death (the perpetrator) and all coverage seems to be from June 2015 so no WP:LASTING coverage. LibStar (talk) 01:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Death toll really doesn't mean anything for notability except it is likely there will be more coverage. Some incidents that killed 20+ people aren't mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia, some incidents where no one died are well referenced and comprehensive and had an effect. The context matters more, and the context of the motive and police here makes me lean keep given the sourcing
Anyway, IMO it is on the edge of NEVENT, since there is later sourcing:
As an ATD merge a small portion to the background section of the 2016 attack on the same police department the next year and redirect, since it seems like relevant context that someone else had tried and failed to do that just the year before, and several reliable sources connect them (and a lot of the same officers were involved). PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:26, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, changing vote to merge relevant content to the background section of 2016 shooting of Dallas police officers. This is probably best served in the context of that, and the comparisons that several sources draw can go in the reactions section. The background section of that article is lacking anyway. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:58, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:41, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Crime Proposed deletions[edit]

Deletion Review[edit]