- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to FBI search of Mar-a-Lago#FBI field office attack. Feel free to Merge any relevant content. Liz Read! Talk! 06:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Cincinnati FBI field office attack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:EVENT. No lasting WP:EFFECT. Almost all the sources provided are from August 2022. LibStar (talk) 02:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This definitely fails sustained and should not have its own article but I feel like given the political motivation there's a plausible redirect target somewhere, where it can be briefly noted. However I am unable to come up with a good one :/ PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Still doesn't fulfill sustained but redirect to its section at FBI search of Mar-a-Lago, the closest claim to notability it has is as a reaction to that plus it's mentioned there already PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as creator - The article is sufficiently notable because the incident was an attack on a federal agency, was committed in response to a significant event (the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago), resulted in an hours-long chase and standoff and multiple road closures, had widespread media coverage, and prompted statements by multiple prominent public figures. The article itself is detailed enough that it would be difficult to merge into another article without losing significant details. --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 10:59, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not meet Wikipedia's requirement of sustained secondary coverage and major lasting effects. All of the sources appear to be contemporary news coverage. This isn't an encyclopedic notable event, it's just a thing that happened. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:14, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting and to see what editors think of the Redirect proposal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:48, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.