The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ~ Amory (utc) 01:42, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Cotton Bowl Classic[edit]

2018 Cotton Bowl Classic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced and way WP:TOOSOON. Bowl game articles are usually created after the teams are announced. JTP (talkcontribs) 22:41, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. JTP (talkcontribs) 22:42, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Lepricavark: The point of deleting is that it's unsourced with no evidence of any sources yet (see below) and all sections are empty. It's absolutely WP:TOOSOON for this. JTP (talkcontribs) 03:17, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I respectfully submit that deleting the article now is pointless as the game is less than a year away. Lepricavark (talk) 04:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 23:34, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 23:34, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, a source has been found and we all know this event will either take place, or be notable for not taking place. SportingFlyer talk 06:28, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@MARY018: Can you elaborate? There is a completely valid deletion rationale. JTP (talkcontribs) 03:55, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The unreferenced is a valid argument but becomes no longer relevant once a source is added, which I just did. If it was one of the hundreds of bowl games I can understand waiting for sources, but this is for the Playoffs so I can understand the early focus. A redirect to College Football Playoffs, or Cotton Bowl Classic, would of been a better alternative than requesting deletion. WikiVirusC(talk) 04:45, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.