The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 11:52, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2019 CAFA U-16 Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Initial PROD statement was WP:NOTSTATS applies. Unable to find the independent sourcing required to pass WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT.

Contested with I have updated some references and I have noticed thats cafa website is official site of Central Asian Football Assassination. So its now no one raise any questions. I don't see any reasons why the editor said that. The article have created three years back.

Firstly, the tournament is organised by CAFA so the CAFA website is not an independent source, see WP:IS for more info. SPORTSEVENT requires news coverage should be extensive (e.g., outside of the week of its occurrence and in non-local newspapers) and that articles should have well-sourced prose, not merely a list of stats which also overlaps with WP:NOTSTATS. A search per WP:BEFORE did not yield any coverage that qualifies for any of the above guidelines. Lastly, the article being three years old is a fallacious keep argument per WP:LONGTIME. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.