The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2027 Rugby World Cup

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON. The event is 11 years away and the article is also unreferenced. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 17:57, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing in the article to support this. It probably will happen, but as the bidding hasn't started, seems to fail WP:CRYSTAL. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 19:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No coverage that I could find. Bidding is only starting for the 2023 event and the only items concerning the 2027 event are that USA "might possibly maybe" consider bidding. I don't think that kind of information would make it into the article and so the article should not exist. No longer a penguin (talk) 19:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Concur with the above. If there was just a little more coverage other than one or two potential bids, then maybe. Until then, it's too soon. GabeIglesia (talk) 20:52, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is way too soon to have an article be created and I will concur with the above two replies. Matt294069 is coming 23:43, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as clearly simply too soon. SwisterTwister talk 22:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.