The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 09:54, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

30,000 Leagues Under the Sea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequately sourced article about a minor film, consisting of mostly plot detail. I was only able to find a couple of newspaper articles that make trivial mention of the film in the year the film was released. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. - MrX 20:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. - MrX 20:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to The_Asylum#Filmography. I couldn't find anything other than in passing reference, such as "he also starred in this film" or "another version of the Verne novel is" type of mentions. It might be a worthwhile enough redirect to the Asylum filmography, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:32, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep I found available independent (poor) sources listed here. In connection with its cast and production, I found more about the production on The Wrap Dread Central and multiple books which can be used to bring this article up to snuff. It ain't some super blockbuster, no... but it has been written about in enough places to merit inclusion. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:58, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge - Doesn't pass N or GNG. The minor cites don't save it in this case. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:21, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:53, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 03:43, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.