- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 01:04, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- 4Girls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A promotional article, with no substantial 3rd party reliable published sources, .
The first Hebrew reference is their own web site, the second a promotional interview where the representatives of the company says whatever they care to (and is therefore not independent). Essentially everything else is a mere directory listing. DGG ( talk ) 00:33, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 02:36, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 02:36, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 02:36, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:PROMO and WP:GNG. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:23, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While Israel HaYom is the most read daily in Israel, its article was written by a PR company for which clients pay. This and other references (directories, self, etc.) can support data in the article, NOT the notability of the subject. gidonb (talk) 05:04, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.