The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 05:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ACD (claims services company)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. A search for coverage from independent reliable sources yields nothing but press releases. The article is promotional in tone, and the awards mentioned in the article are themselves not notable. — ξ ^xplicit 00:53, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. no evidence for notability. Almost an A7. The references are either trivial , or judt placement on a list-- "fastest growing" is a polite synonym for "not yet notable." DGG ( talk ) 19:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable company.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:19, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete – Per several source searches, does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Has not received enough notice by reliable sources to qualify for a Wikipedia article at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.