The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AOD Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable company. One source in the article is a press release, the other is guidelines which make no mention of the company. Ghits return press releases and other trivial mentions. Fails WP:CORP and thus WP:V. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 18:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  21:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Corporate advert. Nothing but the company's website and press releases out there. §FreeRangeFrog 00:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - spam/advert created by single-subject user; no references which establish notability. Dialectric (talk) 00:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete: blatant advertising for a minor non-consumer software developer with no showing of importance at all. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.