The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not much participation at this AfD, but this probably qualifies for speedy deletion.--Kubigula (talk) 03:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aameer Mian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

A good faith effort to find references has failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources in order to comply with notability requirements. The search for references has included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals Oo7565 (talk) 19:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:30, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete A clear example of attempted self-promotion that was previously tagged for Speedy Deletion, but had the tag removed by the article creator. Edward321 (talk) 23:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.