The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing based on an early consensus. Missvain (talk) 01:22, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abdulhakim Idris[edit]

Abdulhakim Idris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly-sourced stub about a non-notable individual whose only claim to fame relates to organisations of dubious notability (albeit with grandiose titles, fails WP:GNG / WP:BIO. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Needs more categories.–Cupper52^Discuss! 11:26, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Deleteper WP:GNG and WP:MILL.--Pmand ^{(talk • Contributions)} 11:56, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete sourcing is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Functionary in an ethnic association. Oaktree b (talk) 16:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable. scope_creep^Talk 15:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.