Points of interest related to China on Wikipedia: Outline – History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment – Style – To-do

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to China. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

1. Edit this page and add ((Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName)) to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
2. You should also tag the AfD by adding ((subst:delsort|China|~~~~)) to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove links to other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to China.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Asia.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

• WikiProject Deletion sorting/China/archive

• See also: Wikipedia:China-related topics notice board

Yangyuan & Tiesiyuan station

Yangyuan & Tiesiyuan station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG - while there are plenty of sources about the line, none seem to discuss this station in any detail. A redirect to Line 5 (Wuhan Metro) seems best. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Stations, Transportation, and China. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Line 5 (Wuhan Metro)Djflem (talk) 05:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjiao Road station

Sanjiao Road station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG - while there are plenty of sources about the line, none seem to discuss this station in any detail. A redirect to Line 5 (Wuhan Metro) seems best. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Stations, Transportation, and China. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Line 5 (Wuhan Metro) (for now) Djflem (talk) 05:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yuan Yuan (actor)

Yuan Yuan (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article (more of a filmography list) has no inline citation. Has no corresponding article in any other wiki (rare for a foreign actor). Has one generic external link reference. The majority of the roles played by the actor were minor and were part of mostly non-notable works. I was unable to find any significant in-depth coverage from reliable publications (in English) that warrants GNG or WP:NACTOR. If anyone's able to find sources in foreign languages, please list them. X (talk) 03:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and Japan. X (talk) 03:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zhang Lijun (economist)

Zhang Lijun (economist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional and no establishment of notability with independent WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 17:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Economics, and China. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ruth Mulan Chu Chao

Ruth Mulan Chu Chao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about the mother of Elaine and Angela Chao. Though the article itself appears fleshed out and well-sourced at first glance, taking some time to read through it, I call into question whether Ruth is notable per GNG. More than half of the article pertains to her personal life, the events of which are not themselves notable. The only other section, "Philanthropy", includes only buildings named after her posthumously, due to donations from her husband and daughters, including a building at the Harvard Business School.

There are 18 cited sources. Of those, nine are from the HBS website. Two are from the Foremost Group, an organization headed by her daughter Angela. One is a news story covering Angela's death. One is an obituary of her other daughter, Jeannette. Two are Ruth's obituaries - one is clearly just a death announcement. The other is called "Chao's mother mourned", explicitly defining her notability solely in relation to her daughter Elaine. One source is just about Elaine's comments on the Green Line expansion, ten years after Ruth's death. There is one source (#14) honoring Ruth (again, posthumously) and her husband as philanthropists, however this link is defunct. In addition, the source appears to be a press release from the organization that gave them the award. This is a nothing article. Thesixthstaff (talk) 15:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Some hits in Gbooks [1], is the best. The NBC News article is fine. This [2] is in Chinese, but seems to be about her. Should have GNG with these. Oaktree b (talk) 15:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Google Books source you provided is not about Ruth. It is about Elaine and Ruth is mentioned exactly once. Being related to someone notable is not notable. The NBC News article also 1. is about an event that happened multiple years after she died and 2. does not describe anything Ruth did that would be notable. Having something named after you because your family member who loves you is rich is not notable. If someone can translate the Chinese and use any of that information in the article I can be swayed, but the first two sources you gave aren't doing it for me. Thesixthstaff (talk) 15:50, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up, I went to the Amazon page for the book and translated the description from the original Chinese [3]. It appears that this book was written because Elaine has said publicly "I really hope you have the opportunity to know my mother". Other quotes from the description include "She may seem like an ordinary housewife, but she has extraordinary circumstances" and "An ordinary life can also have extraordinary power", which doesn't really bring me much hope that the book would have her meet GNG. Also, a majority of the testimonials are immediate family members. Thesixthstaff (talk) 15:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Business, China, and New York. Skynxnex (talk) 16:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment It looks like the ILF source got rescued. I took a look at it, and it still doesn't help the case IMO. It claims that until Ruth's death, most of hers and her husband's philanthropic gifts were made anonymously. Her husband only began giving in her name once she had died in 2007. I guess my question here is: can you be made notable solely for someone else signing your name to monetary gifts after you die? Thesixthstaff (talk) 16:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Other sources do also exist, including this site of 17 slides and explanatory text, posted by the Baker Library of the Harvard Business School. The first slide, now listed as an external link at the bottom of the article, includes pertinent quotations from Laura Bush, Sandra Day O'Connor and Hillary Clinton. Another source: a book by Cui Jiarong, with the Amazon translation. Meets GNG. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 17:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can we consider the Harvard Business School page to be an independent source, considering that this coverage is there only because the Chao family donated money for the building named for her? Also, the book you linked is the same book I addressed in a previous reply. Thesixthstaff (talk) 17:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep. Although it's not yet referenced in the article, the Chinese book found by User:Oaktree b appears to be a full biography of the late Madam Chao. Although I don't have access to it, the author is a lecturer at a Taiwanese university and it was published by the books division of Commonwealth magazine, which we oddly don't have an article on, but is roughly Taiwan's equivalent to The Atlantic or The Economist. That's exactly what we need for GNG, even though it's not ideal to only have a single source. Matt's talk 17:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bought the book, currently reading it by google translating each page and I will report back. So far, the thesis appears to be "she raised strong daughters and after she died a building was named after her". Which is admirable! But I still don't get the impression that she is independently notable. Thesixthstaff (talk) 17:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have read 10% of the book so far. A few quotes that stuck out to me:

• "[Chao] is a typical housewife who has always made the happiness of her husband and children her life's work. In her memory, she just did things silently to make her husband's life with her children a little more comfortable and easier."
• "On the surface all the deeds related to big people in the world cannot be found on her resume. However, this good wife and mother with high output value wholeheartedly assisted her soulmate Zhao Xicheng who became an internationally renowned Chinese ship king, and at the same time, cultivated six daughters with excellent character and professional excellence with gentle maternal love".

This just really comes off to me as a very touching memorial project for a deeply beloved, but low-profile, family member. I don't think it confers notability, given the source itself basically says so. Thesixthstaff (talk) 18:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: WP:BLUDGEONING is a form of WP:DISRUPTIVE editing. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 18:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is true. That said, "Sometimes, a long comment or replying multiple times is perfectly acceptable or needed." Each of my responses has come after additional research into the topic, as I think folks here have raised valid points. I apologize for a potentially brusque or overconfident tone. Thesixthstaff (talk) 18:50, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your tone is fine. But volume is an issue: See top editors. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 19:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: This has a brief description of her life [4]. Oaktree b (talk) 23:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Titans Mobile

Titans Mobile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any significant English sources, and the Chinese sources that I found seemed to be the company's financial reports. QuietCicada chirp 17:09, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and China. QuietCicada chirp 17:09, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War

Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Chinese Civil War#Resumed fighting (1946–1949). I'm skeptical that this WP:SPINOFF article is necessary at all. It was started because there was some confusion over why Chinese Communist Revolution doesn't have the same name as the English translation of the Chinese Wikipedia's article's title.

GoldWitness, the English and Chinese Wikipedias don't have to line up perfectly. Links between Chinese and English articles are meant to link the two articles with the most similar subject matter, not exact twins. This is a natural result of the fact that English and Chinese historians describe this period of history differently, and group the events differently.

If it's decided this article is necessary, GoldWitness please see these instructions on how to do it properly: WP:CORRECTSPLIT SilverStar54 (talk) 01:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, Politics, and China. SilverStar54 (talk) 01:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First, thank you for letting me know the instructions on splitting an article! In my mind, the Chinese Communist Revolution differs so greatly from the Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War that a spinoff is necessary. As the article describes, the Chinese Communist Revolution "is about political and social developments, and the origin and aftermath of the war" while the Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War is the second stage of the Chinese Civil War. In other words, one is about political and social development, and the other is about the second stage of military conflict. They are not lining up slightly differently. Instead, they are two almost completely different subjects.GoldWitness (talk) 01:46, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely right that "Chinese Communist Revolution" and "Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War" are not the same things. That's why I'm suggesting that this page become a redirect to Chinese Civil War#Resumed fighting (1946–1949), not Chinese Communist Revolution.

I also agree with you that the Chinese article on the "Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War" probably should not be linked to the English article on the Chinese Communist Revolution (or the other languages' articles on that topic). Personally, I would support you creating a new Wikidata item for the Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War and assigning the Chinese article to that item, rather than to the one for the Chinese Communist Revolution (although other editors might disagree). Here's a helpful guide on how to edit Wikidata: [5], and some introductory stuff about interlanguage links.

Basically, I think you're rushing to create a new article when this problem could be better solved in other ways. SilverStar54 (talk) 00:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for showing me the guide on Wikidata. I've never heard of Wikidata before! I will look at it some time. GoldWitness (talk) 23:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding rushing to create a new article, I saw some editors suggest that this article's content and sources were not enough for a spinoff. So, I wanted to show that this article has substantial content and sources by expanding it rather than spending time thinking about and writing an opposing opinion. Once this article is developed, I think the arguments supporting those comments suggesting a merge or deletion in this AfD debate will no longer be valid. Anyway, thank you very much for sharing your opinion! GoldWitness (talk) 23:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have created a new article in Wikidata called "Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War" and linked several languages to it. Thanks! GoldWitness (talk) 22:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SilverStar54! I have launched a discussion about those languages, which are titled "Chinese Communist Revolution" while actually referring to the Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War in Wikidata. I think this may be controversial, and thus, a consensus is probably needed to change the links further. I hope you can participate in this discussion. Thanks! GoldWitness (talk) 23:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This request is similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese Communist Revolution. If you go back to see the what the article Chinese Communist Revolution was like in 2013 when the deletion request was made, you can find that all of its content was about the Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War. So, there is no need to discuss again on whether a WP:SPINOFF article is necessary. GoldWitness (talk) 02:22, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify: the article seems like it's still in the process of being written, so incubating it in draftspace until it gets expanded sufficiently would probably be better than deletion. DrowssapSMM 14:44, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge. If there were much, much better sources to prove coverage for the subject there would be a stronger case for keeping the article. But as it stands it would be better merged given a huge deficit in content. GuardianH (talk) 21:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Do you think it is a better choice to give editors some time to edit this article? If, after some time, this article still has a huge deficit in content, we can post another AfD at that time. The fact that this AfD was launched fewer than 2 hours before the article was created gives no chance to add content and sources.

  GoldWitness (talk) 22:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Related to sources, I have added some books in the "Further reading" section of this article. These may be useful for citation. GoldWitness (talk) 22:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge – if Chinese Civil War was 5000 words longer, I would support this being a separate article, but as mentioned above, it seems presently best to have one article with the adequate level of detail. Remsense诉 06:10, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – As per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese Communist Revolution, a consensus has been reached before. Haha33 2 (talk) 07:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  What? That's a different article. Remsense诉 09:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The article Chinese Communist Revolution in 2013 and this article refer to the same event. So, they are actually the same. Haha33 2 (talk) 17:35, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  They do not. Wars and revolutions are different historical events, even if they blur together. The French Revolution is not the same thing as the French Revolutionary Wars. American Revolutionary War and American Revolution are also separate articles. Russian Civil War, Russian Revolution, and so on. Remsense诉 12:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  If you think they are different, I will reuse the opinions in this discussion.

  "The article [Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War] is linked to from Chinese Civil War and the former is supposed to be a sub-article of the latter covering the second part of the civil war. The article Chinese Civil War contains only summary information of this subject which should be expanded upon. Poor quality content is not a reason for deletion of an article. Rather the article should be improved to meat the required standards." ---- Rincewind42

  "I find it generally unfathomable that this topic would not deserve its own article. Just becase a topic can be thought of as a part of another topic doesn't mean it can't have its own article. There is plenty of overlap of this kind on wikipedia and it is a very good thing. There's plenty of bad content on wikipedia's china related articles, be bold by deleting clearly bogus content, not the articles. (not to suggest there aren't also plenty of bogus articles). WP:AQU, I've made this kind of mistake myself." ---- Metal lunchbox Haha33 2 (talk) 20:40, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I do think it's reasonable for this to be its own article as a sub-period of Chinese Civil War, and to be summarized there. My concerns were merely that splitting the article was not the correct balance at this particular moment. Remsense诉 02:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  If you think that this and Chinese Communist Revolution are substantially the same subject, wouldn't you want to merge this article with that one? Why would you support keeping this article? SilverStar54 (talk) 23:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Because this and 2013's version of Chinese Communist Revolution are substantially the same, and the deletion discussion of Chinese Communist Revolution took place in that year. I think the consensus reached in 2013 was that the Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War was a part of the Chinese Civil War, and it deserved its own article, and I reused it in this deletion discussion. This article and the current version of Chinese Communist Revolution differ. In other words, Chinese Communist Revolution used to wrongfully refer to the Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War, but it is corrected now. Haha33 2 (talk) 00:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Okay that makes more sense. I still think that Chinese Civil War isn't long enough to require a split, but I understand your position. SilverStar54 (talk) 08:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete without keeping a redirect. Super Ψ Dro 15:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Chinese Civil War#Resumed fighting (1946–1949). In English, this war is generally known as the Chinese Civil War, or at least part of the Chinese Civil War. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zhengzhou No.47 Middle School

Zhengzhou No.47 Middle School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find anything notable online about the school (which has 7000 students and 500 staff). Most online articles repeat the existing Wikipedia wording which reads like an advertisement. The only exception I can find is Deloitte - who say the school offers classes to international students (https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/at/Documents/Tax/Chinese%20Services%20Group/kr_cbc_investment_henan-zhengzhou_en_201612.pdf) Newhaven lad (talk) 17:47, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and China. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. The subject passes Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Schools, which says:

  All universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must either satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations, the general notability guideline, or both. For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria. (See also WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)

  Sources
  1. "叶小耀：郑州47中的发展是郑州教育史上的奇迹" [Ye Xiaoyao: The development of Zhengzhou No. 47 Middle School is a miracle in the history of education in Zhengzhou]. China Daily (in Chinese). 2016-05-27. Archived from the original on 2024-03-09. Retrieved 2024-03-09.

     The article notes: "郑州市第47中学（下称郑州47中），一所只有20年历史的学校。每年都有毕业生成功考入清华、北大、浙大等名牌大学，连续多年高考国家级宏志班一本上线率达到100%，2013-2016年连续四届国际班毕业生全部被世界500强名校录取。2015年，郑州47中获得了河南省“十大最具国际特色学校”荣誉称号，2016年被评为河南省唯一一家国际教育类“河南教育名片”。"

     From Google Translate: "Zhengzhou No. 47 Middle School (hereinafter referred to as Zhengzhou No. 47 Middle School) is a school with a history of only 20 years. Every year, graduates are successfully admitted to prestigious universities such as Tsinghua University, Peking University, and Zhejiang University. For many years, the admission rate of the national-level Hongzhi class in the college entrance examination has reached 100%. From 2013 to 2016, all graduates of the four consecutive international classes were admitted to the world's top 500 universities. . In 2015, Zhengzhou No. 47 Middle School won the honorary title of "Top Ten Most International Schools" in Henan Province. In 2016, it was named the only international education "Henan Education Business Card" in Henan Province."

  2. Tan, Ping 谭萍 (2022-10-10). "优质教育资源扩容！郑州市第四十七初级中学（东校区）正式揭牌" [Expansion of high-quality educational resources! Zhengzhou No. 47 Junior High School (East Campus) was officially unveiled]. Dahe Daily (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2024-03-09. Retrieved 2024-03-09.

     The article notes: "郑州市第四十七初级中学1996年建校，先后被授予“全国文明单位”“全国文明校园”“全国国防教育示范学校”“郑州市首批新优质初中”等国家省市级荣誉百余项，连续20年荣评“郑州市教学创新先进单位”。此次优质教育资源的扩容，将推进优质教育更加均衡。"

     From Google Translate: "Zhengzhou No. 47 Junior High School was established in 1996. It has been awarded more than 100 national, provincial and municipal honors such as "National Civilized Unit", "National Civilized Campus", "National Defense Education Demonstration School", "Zhengzhou City's First Batch New High-Quality Junior High School", etc. Xiang has been rated as "Zhengzhou Advanced Unit for Teaching Innovation" for 20 consecutive years. This expansion of high-quality educational resources will promote a more balanced high-quality education."

     The article notes: "大河报·豫视频记者现场了解到，郑州市第四十七初级中学（东校区）位于金水区杨金路街道。... 郑州市第四十七初级中学（东校区）在建项目工程计划将于2023年5月经过验收，2023年9月投入使用。该校区占地40余亩，建筑面积60000平方米，可满足48教学班的正常使用。"

     From Google Translate: "Dahe News·Yu Video reporter learned on the spot that Zhengzhou No. 47 Junior High School (East Campus) is located in Yangjin Road Street, Jinshui District. ... The project under construction in the middle school (East Campus) is scheduled to be inspected and accepted in May 2023 and put into use in September 2023. The campus covers an area of ​​more than 40 acres, with a construction area of ​​60,000 square meters, which can meet the normal use of 48 teaching classes."

  3. Wang, Guoyong 王国勇 (2023-10-25). Zhao, Na 赵娜 (ed.). "郑州市第四十七初级中学校长夏霞：把铿锵誓言照进现实" [Xia Xia, principal of No. 47 Junior High School in Zhengzhou City: Turning the sonorous oath into reality]. 祖国 [Motherland] (in Chinese). China Economic Media Association. Archived from the original on 2024-03-09. Retrieved 2024-03-09.

     The article notes: "1996年大学毕业后，被分配到郑州市第四十七中学，成为这所新建校的第一批教师。从筚路蓝缕的艰难创业到成为有广泛影响力的全国文明校园，夏霞见证了这所学校迭代升级的每一步，她也从一名教师成长为中层干部、副校长、专职副书记到分级管理后郑州市第四十七初级中学的校长。"

     From Google Translate: "After graduating from university in 1996, he was assigned to Zhengzhou No. 47 Middle School and became the first batch of teachers in this new school. From a difficult start-up to becoming a nationally civilized campus with widespread influence, Xia Xia has witnessed every step of the school's iterative upgrades. She has also grown from a teacher to a middle-level cadre, vice-principal, full-time deputy secretary to a post-graduation management The principal of Zhengzhou No. 47 Junior High School."

     The article notes: "8月27日，郑州市第四十七初级中学东校区迎来了首批1000余名学子，为了保证新校区开学平稳有序，夏霞整整两周没有回家，吃住在校、时刻守护。"

     From Google Translate: "On August 27, the East Campus of No. 47 Junior High School in Zhengzhou welcomed the first batch of more than 1,000 students. In order to ensure the smooth and orderly opening of the new campus, Xia Xia did not go home for two whole weeks, living and eating in school and guarding her at all times."

  4. Xu, Hongli 许红丽; Zhao, Demin 赵德民 (2019-12-18). "法制安全知识进校园郑州市第四十七初级中学举行法制安全教育讲座" [Legal safety knowledge enters the campus. Zhengzhou City No. 47 Junior High School held a legal safety education lecture] (in Chinese). China Internet Information Center. Archived from the original on 2024-03-09. Retrieved 2024-03-09.

     The article notes: "据悉，郑州市第四十七初级中学除积极开展讲座外，还进一步完善了校园欺凌及校园突发事件处置的处理制度、措施，建立了校园欺凌事件、校园突发事件处置应急处理预案，明确了相关岗位教职工预防和职责。"

     From Google Translate: "It is reported that in addition to actively conducting lectures, Zhengzhou No. 47 Junior High School has further improved the system and measures for handling campus bullying and campus emergencies , established an emergency response plan for campus bullying and campus emergencies , and clearly stated The prevention and responsibilities of faculty and staff in relevant positions have been clarified. "

  5. "鄭州市第四十七初級中學東校區今秋將正式招生" [Zhengzhou No. 47 Junior Middle School East Campus will officially enroll students this fall]. Hong Kong Commercial Daily (in Chinese). 2023-06-19. Archived from the original on 2024-03-09. Retrieved 2024-03-09.

     The article notes: "6月19日，記者從鄭州市第四十七初級中學獲悉，鄭州市第四十七初級中學東校區（以下簡稱東校區）將在2023年秋季學期正式投入使用，新七年級計劃招收8個班。"

     From Google Translate: "On June 19, reporters learned from Zhengzhou No. 47 Junior High School that the East Campus of Zhengzhou No. 47 Junior High School (hereinafter referred to as the East Campus) will be officially put into use in the fall semester of 2023. The new seventh grade students are planned to enroll 8 classes."

  6. Zhang, Kedan 张可丹 (2003-07-05). "郑州市 10所 高中戴上"示范帽"" [10 high schools in Zhengzhou awarded "demonstration model" status]. Dahe Daily (in Chinese).

     The article notes: "本报讯由郑州市政府教育督导室组织，各社区代表、学生家长代表参与，经过近半年时间的开放式评估，郑州市首批１０所示范性高中昨天脱颖而出。 据了解，从２００２年９月２５日起到今年６月１８日止，１０所示范性高中经过了开放性的评估方式，"

     From Google Translate: "This report was organized by the Education Supervision Office of the Zhengzhou Municipal Government, with the participation of community representatives and student parent representatives. After nearly half a year of open evaluation, the first batch of 10 demonstration model high schools in Zhengzhou stood out yesterday. It is understood that from 25 September 2002 to 18 June this year, 10 model high schools passed an open evaluation method."

     The article notes: "这１０所示范性高中分别为：... 郑州市第四十七中学(高 中部) ..."

     From Google Translate: "These 10 demonstration model high schools are: ... Zhengzhou No. 47 Middle School (High School Division) ..."

  7. Zhang, Kedan 张可丹; Zhang, Qiaofu 张乔甫 (2004-03-30). "逃生演练 该跳楼时就跳楼" [Escape drill: jump when it’s time to jump]. Dahe Daily (in Chinese).

     The article notes: "本报讯昨天上午9时15分，郑州市第四十七中学高中部的警报突然拉响，教学楼内外迅速弥漫起滚滚浓烟。三楼6名被困在阳台上的学生，在消防官兵的指挥下，纵身从10米高处跃向 地上的气垫(右图 )… …这是昨天该校在全国中小学安全教育日组织的一场大型逃生演练，200多名学生分别采用不同的方式安全逃离了“危险地带”。"

     From Google Translate: "This newspaper reported that at 9:15 a.m. yesterday, the alarm in the high school section of Zhengzhou No. 47 Middle School suddenly sounded, and thick smoke quickly filled the inside and outside of the teaching building. Six students trapped on the balcony on the third floor, under the command of fire officers and soldiers, jumped from a height of 10 meters to an air mattress on the ground (picture on the right)... This was organized by the school yesterday on the National Primary and Secondary School Safety Education Day In a large-scale escape drill, more than 200 students used different methods to escape the "danger zone" safely."

  8. "国际教育实验班进驻郑州高中 中学校园出现留学 "预备军"" [International education experimental class is stationed in Zhengzhou high school, and a "preparatory army" for studying abroad appears on the middle school campus]. Dahe Daily (in Chinese). 2004-05-25.

     The article notes: "与此同时，郑州市第四十七中学也已通过中国教育国际交流协会，与新西兰国立西方理工学院签订协议，成立中国与新西兰友好实验班，并已在郑州市教育局备案，计划于2004年招收首批计划内学生。"

     From Google Translate: "At the same time, Zhengzhou No. 47 Middle School has also signed an agreement with the National Western Institute of Technology of New Zealand through the China Education International Exchange Association to establish a China-New Zealand friendship experimental class. It has been registered with the Zhengzhou Municipal Education Bureau and is planned to be launched in 2004 after recruiting the first batch of planned students."

  9. "宏志班里的碰撞与成长" [Collision and growth in provincial class]. Dahe Daily (in Chinese). 2004-06-01.

     The article notes: "去年9月开学后，郑州市第四十七中、省实验中学等全省5所高中，开办了第一批省级宏志班。根据省教育厅的批准，共有150名来自全省各地贫困地区、家庭贫困却品学兼优的学生，走进了郑州市的两所高中。"

     From Google Translate: "After the start of school in September last year, five high schools in the province, including Zhengzhou No. 47 Middle School and Provincial Experimental Middle School, opened the first batch of provincial ambition classes."

     The article notes: "在郑州市第四十七中，学生刚进校时，学校了解到，几乎所有的宏志生在英语和计算机两科上，学习起来都非常吃力，而四十七中的不少城市学生却又有着城里独生子女的骄横等通病。"

     From Google Translate: "In Zhengzhou No. 47 Middle School, when the students first entered the school, the school learned that almost all Hongzhi students had difficulty learning in English and computer subjects, while many urban students in No. 7 Middle School had difficulty learning. He has the arrogance and arrogance common among only children in the city."

     The article notes: "五一期间，郑州市第四十七中的老师到了全省多个贫困县乡进行考察。在那里，他们看到了更多家庭贫困的学生。"

     From Google Translate: "During the May Day period, teachers from Zhengzhou No. 47 Middle School visited many impoverished counties and villages across the province for inspections. There, they saw more students from poor families."

  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Zhengzhou No. 47 Middle School (simplified Chinese: 郑州市第四十七中学; traditional Chinese: 鄭州市第四十七中學) to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 11:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. One of thousands of similar schools. Fails GNG. Bearian (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese lunar coins

Chinese lunar coins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't appear to meet WP:N. I can't see a good WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 18:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Owen× ☎ 19:14, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The notability is there (random assortment of first stuff I saw, there's likely better sourcing out there):

• "面值"一元"卖百元？当心，这类龙年纪念钞买不得-新华网". www.news.cn. Retrieved 2024-03-04.
• 郁祥桢 (1995). 钱币丛谈 (in Chinese). 上海古籍出版社. ISBN 978-7-5325-1852-4.
• "【纪念币面面观】纪念币上的中国龙_中国银行保险报网". www.cbimc.cn. Retrieved 2024-03-04.

Only problem is that the entire article is unsourced... (which is why this is not a "keep") Jumpytoo Talk 05:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The article just needs to be cleaned up (adding sources). Abstrakt (talk) 02:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zhuan Zhu

Zhuan Zhu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is not notable and BIO1E applies. I could find pre-Wikipedia sources like this and this but they only mention him as the assassin of King Liao. This seemingly can't be draftified and redirects are costly. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and China. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• There seems to be a number of sources at the Japanese and Chinese Wikipedias - have any of those been checked? BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• This is frankly an odd nomination. It includes a search on Google Books on the string Zhuan Zhu "專諸" which normally excludes English-only and Chinese-only sources, but despite that the search still return results as stated on the nom. Those are entries on a compilation of characters in Beijing Opera, showing that the story of this assassination is still being performed after 2,500 years (thus BIO1E does not apply). Another thing is the arbitrary cut-off criteria for "pre-Wikipedia sources", as if books published after Wikipedia's establishment are not reliable. Even supposing that this page could not stand on its own, redirecting to Liao of Wu is a perfectly valid option and the "costly" argument is just nonsensical here. Searching on Google Books with the English (specifying "assassin" to filter out unrelated mentions) and Chinese separately gives pages upon pages of results, and for that I say keep. _dk (talk) 01:12, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep per _dk's comment Ominateu (talk) 11:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC) striking comment by confirmed and blocked sockpuppet Atlantic306 (talk) 19:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep What nonsense, AFD! A historical figure from ancient China and a regicide who played a key role in history is clearly notable. You should read the Chinese Wikipedia article first before opening an AFD discussion. Shame on you. 1.46.91.225 (talk) 08:33, 2 March 2024 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE – Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While prima facie the below looks like a clear keep, I cannot in good conscience close as 'keep' a debate on an article which has absolutely no references included. Relisting to ensure that if we keep this article, it is in a suitable condition to do so. While AfD is not cleanup, it's also not a suicide pact.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Underbar dk: Would you be willing to add some of the sources to the article? BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zari_Kovo

Zari_Kovo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability, Real estate dealer. I don't think he has a place on Wikipedia. Otherwise any property owner could get an article. Tapal2024 (talk) 20:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 14. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 21:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Fashion, Hong Kong, and Bulgaria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The only RS, Haretz, is an article about Oded Kobo who isn't this individual. The rest aren't RS and I don't see anything about this person. Oaktree b (talk) 22:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Usmart Securities

Usmart Securities (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No establishment of notability using independent WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 14:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: PROMO. Mentioned in articles about suspending trading accounts, which are glossed over here. One is paywalled, the others aren't strictly about this firm. Oaktree b (talk) 14:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: sources 3 and 8 are about Brightsmart, which seems to be a different company. I'm not seeing how they're related to this company, unsure why they're being used for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 14:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Not enough reliable sources are available. There is even a press release used. Z3r0h3r000 (talk) 07:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A House Is Not a Home (TV series) (via WP:PROD)

Peter Nguyen Van Hung

Peter Nguyen Van Hung (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible cross-wiki spam, noticed some 15 years ago already. I don't see notability; he is an activist but without major achievements. Nadzik (talk) 10:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Taiwan and Vietnam. Nadzik (talk) 10:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity, Japan, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Google translate isn't giving me any help on the Chinese sources but the State Department and Taipei Times both look like significant coverage in reliable sources.— Moriwen (talk) 14:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Mei Chia-shu (via WP:PROD on 28 January 2024)