The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cabayi (talk) 08:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abe Gray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnoteworthy person Burned Toast (talk) 02:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also believe he has an impressively high amount of coverage beyond the cannabis museum that he deserves his own page. He is public interest for being an unusual and fairly controversial character.

He has been covered for a variety of reasons - some of them including getting arrested at University of Otago, with criticism from Metiria Turei, being president of a notorious cannabis university club Otago NORML, running in mayoral and general elections for TOP, Legalise Cannabis, and independent, founding New Zealand's first and only cannabis museum Whakamana Cannabis Museum, a $2M project with the founder of Cookie Time for an elaborate cannabis institution, considering a $25000 private prosecution of a university vice-chancellor on behalf of students, getting told not to wear a cannabis shirt at the airport, starting a pro-cannabis group called Start The Conversation which was covered by media due to support from Helen Kelly, Marc Willers, Lucy Lawless; appearing in a cannabis documentary covered by New Zealand media outlets. He is also frequently asked by news outlets for his opinion of cannabis issues, which is why there is a section dedicated to 'Views'.

I will link to some of the pages of significant coverage:

Nexus000 (talk) 03:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nexus000: yeah it was just things like that, looking through, that could be referenced by something better so that is good you changed it. Things like that though shouldn't affect the decision about deletion as there appears clear WP:GNG from what was in the reliable source/s provided. NZFC(talk)(cont) 00:44, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.