- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Abh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As much as I like that series, this article is all unreferenced fancruft (fails WP:Notability (fiction)). Last AfD ended in 'no consensus', IMHO merge, but there is no referenced content to merge, so... worry not, this is all on Seikai Wikia, so we don't have to worry anything valuable will be lost. PS. Clearly the AfD for this article template needs a fix... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:45, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:37, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:37, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:37, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete/merge per nom. The only real argument in favor of keeping last time starts with "Redirecting to a disambiguation and purging the content does not result in a net benefit to Wikipedia." which seems like a WP:LOSE argument to me. Gaelan 💬✏️ 04:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.