The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Abhinandan Varthaman. The Keep rationales, apart from the first two, are simply "it's notable". Black Kite (talk) 00:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Abhinandan moustache (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough for stand alone article, fails WP:GNG. Delete and redirect to parent page. Störm (talk) 21:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Easily passes GNG. There are dozens of news stories discussing this in detail, how it appears, how tens of thousands of people are suddenly wearing it, how numerous companies are using it to promote products, what it represents, its history, etc. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There is no doubt that the subject passes GNG.[1][2] Shashank5988 (talk) 21:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Passing fad and WP:INDISCRIMINATE--regentspark (comment) 22:52, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Abhinandan Varthaman, there is not a need for a separate article. The merely days-old fad is more about emulating the hero pilot than this being a unique topic. Reywas92^Talk 23:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Abhinandan Varthaman - I agree with the above; this doesn't warrant a separate article, but is notable enough to be a section in the Pilot's entry. 100.2.170.20 (talk) 01:52, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:57, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Abhinandan Varthaman, with appropriate expansion of section, no need to have a separate article on this. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:07, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Just because there is passing lighthearted coverage in the newsmedia about a person's body part does not mean wikipedia needs to have a separate article on it. Compare with the deletion discussion for "Michelle Obama's arms", whose closing would be apt for this one, "The result was Delete, and merge in to the [main] article the little that is relevant. This is obviously not a topic that is appropriate for an encyclopedia." Abecedare (talk) 15:36, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• keep This article must keep.because it make world record in some time many people from world are creating this style.many companies using this style in advertisement. merge is not proper way because this article is bigger and it is not right time to merge this article.Indiamerijaan2001 (talk) 14:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Abhinandan Varthaman but keep the short history, per Anna Frodesiak's argument, and because it would be required to attribute whatever is merged. Topic is notable only within the context of the subject's bio. If it becomes an enduring style (longer than, for example, the typical news cycle, or the cycle length of individuals with facial hair shaving) then perhaps an article, but this is WP:TOOSOON for the standalone treatment. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:58, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, dang! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge Moustache Section is already present at the article Abhinandan Varthaman. Adding info from this page to the already present section will add value if any. Standalone is not needed. Though allow recreation if coverage is continued after at least 3 months from now. Accesscrawl (talk) 09:06, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Abhinandan Varthaman.  samee  converse  15:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Abhinandan Varthaman per Coolabahapple. PhilKnight (talk) 17:45, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep enough supporting references. It is now very notable. (Highpeaks35 (talk) 22:18, 8 March 2019 (UTC))[reply]
• Keep to Abhinandan Varthaman because it appears to have enough sources to be its own page, and it will most likely expand with time. puggo (talk) 00:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment See List of facial hairstyles to see how it compares to other articles. (The others there have been around a lot longer.) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:12, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per avobe. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 04:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nomination. Shahidul Hasan Roman (talk) 12:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Abhinandan Varthaman and create a subsection. --Kailash29792 (talk) 07:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.