The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 21:35, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Abijeet Duddala

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actor only involved in one film, fails WP:NACTOR. Ducknish (talk) 20:10, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak KeepThe article as time progresses will get more info and reliable sources..But is the picture in the article free?? Uncletomwood (talk) 13:19, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TOOSOON. As time progresses I may become world famous and get my own article, but because I don't have the sources right now, I don't have an article right now. The same applies to Mr. Duddala. Since he doesn't meet WP:NACTOR, he should go now. Ducknish (talk) 15:53, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See that is my opinion and the guy is an actor and has also acted in a movie which was a box office grosser in India, so I say Weak Keep. Uncletomwood (talk) 15:57, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not !vote multiple times. I have struck part of your post. Spinning Spark 08:09, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:TOOSOON, insufficient roles for WP:NACTOR, insufficient coverage for WP:GNG. J04n(talk page) 23:42, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:14, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Since he is the male-lead in Areyrey I think he meets the notability rules, even if that film has not been released, we have an article and thus it is deemed notable. He has reached multiple significant roles in notable films, so we should keep.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:59, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per JPL. Also, I don't know if the other sources are reliable, but two significant instances of coverage by Hyderabad Times strongly suggests notability. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 16:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per two users above. Tolly 4 bolly 09:10, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per J04n. Indeed, currently we have just one film, which means he fails WP:ACTOR. About the second film, the only source says that it is in preproduction, meaning everything could still happen, and the film was not even actually shot, read WP:CRYSTAL. Then, the only reason to keep the article would be if he passes WP:GNG. So far, we have two paragraph-long articles from the Times of India, which mention him, not even articles about him. THus in my opinion he fails WP:GNG as well. I did not independently search for sources though.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:57, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.