The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Philmont Scout Ranch camps. (non-admin closure) Yash ! 05:52, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Abreu Camp

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same reason as Rich Cabins. Philmonte101 (talk) 23:52, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Copied from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Cabins by davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) at 01:43, 18 October 2015 (UTC): If Alden Brock is to be deleted, let's get rid of this page too. First off, the only source comes from Philmont itself. Rich Cabins should indeed be mentioned somewhere, but I don't like there being an article for it. Philmonte101 (talk) 19:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough information If this camp has significant coverage in the book cited in the references^[1] AND if that book qualifies as a reliable, independent source with respect to this camp, then WP:Notability has been met and it should be kept. Otherwise, barring any other significant coverage from a reliable source, I would recommend merging to Philmont Scout Ranch camps#Abreu. No harm in keeping the history. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:00, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Rohrbacher, Rock (1997). Philmanac: A trekker's guide to the Philmont backcountry. CSS Pub. pp. 48–49. ISBN 0-7880-1469-2.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 02:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 02:54, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. It is difficult to see that sub-camps of a major camp are notable independent of the main camp. Only two out of a large number of sub-camps of Philmont have separate articles and neither stand out above the others. Both should be redirected. --Bduke (Discussion) 09:10, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 16:03, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.