The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rozz Williams. J04n(talk page) 01:47, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accept The Gift of Sin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album, which fails WP:NALBUMS. No sign of any substantial coverage, or of evidence that it charted. The only ref is a link to allmusic.com, which is just a track listing, without a review.

Note that this is part of a long series of permastub articles on non-notable albums created by User:Jax 0677 to increase the link count on superlkuous navboxes created bim, after they have been nominated for deletion. In this case, see the TFD for ((Rozz Williams)). When !vote-count was running 5-2 in favour of deletion, Jax wrote Navbox now has 5 albums. Happy?. That was minutes after he had created stubs 3 non-noatble albums: Every King a Bastard Son, Live in Berlin (Rozz Williams album) and Accept The Gift of Sin. All 3 are now at AFD: see AFD:Every King a Bastard Son, AFD:Live in Berlin (Rozz Williams album) and AFD:Accept The Gift of Sin. (I would have PRODded these, but Jax contests every such provide without providing evidence of notability). BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:NALBUMS. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (or at a minimum, merge to "Rozz Williams") - There is plenty of space in Rozz Williams for track listings and album details. Therefore, now that it is on Wikipedia and properly sourced, it should not be removed so long as the artist or ensemble is notable. There is no encyclopedic reason for not including the track times somewhere on Wikipedia. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:09, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• delete or redirect, not notable. Frietjes (talk) 16:54, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to artist, doesn't meet WP:NALBUMS. Boleyn (talk) 09:38, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.