The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 02:32, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AcquasMagicalAdventures[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo article for self-published children's book, fails WP:NBOOK. PROD contested by article creator without comment. Creator's username indicates they are likely the author of this book. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 21:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 21:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the same reason I put the prod tag on the article - it fails WP:NBOOK. GSMR (talk) 22:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I wish the author well, but at this point in time the book just doesn't pass NBOOK. It hasn't received coverage (reviews, articles about the book) in places Wikipedia would consider reliable like newspapers, academic journals, or major literary websites like Tor.com. Most self-published works fly solidly under the radar because there are so many works and so few outlets that can or will cover them, and this work is not an exception from what I can see. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:21, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, nothing found to assist in notability, appears on amazon, youtube and other similar sites, but no reviews, the series of books have been self published via createspace, an amazon company, very difficult to become notable for wp, hopefully a case of WP:TOOSOON and we will see this author's work(s) on wp in the future.... Coolabahapple (talk) 16:33, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:07, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.