The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snowball delete. Acalamari 18:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adams equation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unsourced original research. Plus I get the feeling that this is just something made up one day. MER-C 09:02, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. OR or joke. Operating 09:08, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Seems to be a hoax ffm 12:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is crap. He's taking the piss. Let's wash our hands of it. Emeraude 14:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as I couldn't find any sources on Dogpile. There are such things as the Adams-Williamson Equation or the Bohart-Adams equation, but they have nothing to do with this article, which is written in a comical fashion, especially that last sentence. Cute, but not encyclopedic. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 16:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, made-up nonsense, not even funny. NawlinWiki 17:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.