The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation if articles (even stubs) on the other locations are written. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:02, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adelboden (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:MOSDAB disambiguations should only list red links when other articles also contain such links. Neither Canton of Lucerne nor Canton of Schwyz mention a place called Adelboden and all other instances of Adelboden I could find on a search of Wikipedia refer to Adelboden, Bern. A search for Adelboden, Schwyz and Adelboden, Lucerne did not return any direct hits. Therefore we do not need this disambiguation page. De728631 (talk) 23:06, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - pointless having a dab page before any of the content has been created; it's just a pointless road to nowhere. Could be recreated if the pages in question are created first, but because of concerns outlined by the nom I doubt they ever will be, and so this can be safely deleted. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 23:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, those places do exist, Adelboden, LU seems to be a part of Wikon, and Adelboden, SZ is apparently nothing more than a road in Steinen. However, they're not worth any redirects, let alone a dab page. My searches mentioned in the nomination above were internal searches on WP. De728631 (talk) 18:16, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.