The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Notability is not established through significant coverage in independent third-party sources. Appears to be primarily drawn from a single sourcebook (Slaves to Darkness), with an additional smattering of original research to provide an out-of-universe link to the current game universe. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk14:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If we have any articles that mention this, then there's no reason not to redirect without deleting as more editors and readers believe it worthwhile than a few deletes in some snapshot in time AfD. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho!23:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We don't, and we shouldn't. There's precious little in the way of verifiable claims one can make about these even if you were to use fictional works as sources. "The Emperor has some guards. They're a mysterious deus ex machina that looks and acts different every time they appear. The end." - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 23:48, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Plot summary and in-universe detail without real-world content. Lack of substantial coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject indicates the topic is non-notable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 01:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article has no citations to third-party sources, which are required to establish notability of a fictional topic. --EEMIV (talk) 03:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Of zero significance to a player of either the miniature or computer game. Of vanishingly little significance to the reader of the fictional works for hire of the 40K universe. Cites no reliable third party sources to establish notablity per the WP:GNG (and given the first two sentences of my rationale AND the restrictive IP policies of games workshop, is unlikely to cite such sources). Delete it. Protonk (talk) 21:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.