- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Yellow Dingo (talk) 00:20, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Adhar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a disambiguation term, and no inbound links. — billinghurst sDrewth 15:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I've added sufficient legitimate entries. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, it serves no harm and serves as a surname/given name directory. --Animalparty! (talk) 04:40, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:APONOTE after the additions by Clarityfiend. Even the version before that should have been kept as it served a valid navigational purpose in directing readers to the two titles that adhar could be a spelling for. The lack of incoming links is irrelevant if this is a term that readers search for. Uanfala (talk) 09:04, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per all above. billinghurst, are the improvements enough to convince you to withdraw your nomination or do you still have concerns? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 10:34, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.